Skip to content
The Green Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Green Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$55kPublic Benefit$53kSocial Science$20kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$6kEducation$1kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
WORLD WAR II VETERANS COMMITTEE$1,000
EISENHOWER FOUNDATION$225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CONVENTION OF THE STATES FOUNDATION: $250 → 16%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $15k → 14%PARKINSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EISENHOWER FOUNDATION: $225 → 10%WORLD WAR II VETERANS COMMITTEE: $1k → 7%ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL: $130 → 15%DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%JUDICIAL WATCH: $10k → 14%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10k → 14%JUDICIAL WATCH: $10k → 14%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5k → 14%CFACT: $25k → 14%CFACT: $20k → 14%COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $10k → 14%CFACT: $10k → 14%COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
VA
MD
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 3 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$108k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+35%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CFACT
    3× · 2022–2024 · $55k
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • VS
    VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • PR
    Parkinson Research Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
3
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
4
Foundation for Advancing Veterans' Health Research

To promote, administer, and conduct research and education at the va to improve the health and lives of veterans.

Health
5
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
8
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
9
Inova Health System Foundation

Inova health system foundation is the parent of inova health system (ihs). ihs provides healthcare and related services throughout northern virginia and the greater metropolitan washington, d.c. area, including certain contiguous counties…

Health
10
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
11
National Veterans Foundation Inc

To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.

—
12
Public Knowledge

Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Parkinson Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CFACT: $55,000 · OtherCFACTCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $20,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROWVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION+4 more: $1,605 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Public Benefit+1 more: $100 · Public BenefitTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$86,605Public Benefit$52,600Health$6,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Green Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Green Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Green Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home