Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Granito Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$30kEducation$29kInternational$5kRecreation & Sports$3kScience & Tech$2kEnvironment$1kReligion$500
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$395k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE$5,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE GARDEN CLUB OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY: $500 → 11%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%BRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE: $5k → 14%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $16k → 10%THE GARDEN CLUB OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY: $500 → 11%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10k → 10%THE GARDEN CLUB OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY: $350 → 11%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $1k → 11%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $600 → 11%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $500 → 11%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $500 → 11%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $500 → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $500 → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $4k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $3k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $2k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 11%WQED: $200 → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $200 → 11%ARCS PITTSBURG CHAPTER: $500 → 11%ARCS PITTSBURG CHAPTER: $475 → 11%ARCS PITTSBURG CHAPTER: $475 → 11%ARCS PITTSBURG CHAPTER: $475 → 11%THE PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $300 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 6 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$39k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+73%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • PP
    PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +73%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • WM
    WQED MULTIMEDIA
    one grant, 2018 · $200 · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Carnegie Mellon University

To create a transformative educational experience for students focused on deep disciplinary knowledge; problem solving; leadership, communication and interpersonal skills; and personal health and well-being. to cultivate a transformative…

—
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Trustees of Dartmouth College: $25,500 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYCARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $19,350 · OtherCARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ARTIndividual grant recipient: $1,925 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $1,000 · OtherCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $10,085 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE INSTITU…+1 more: $200 · Arts & CultureBRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE: $5,000 · InternationalPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $3,400 · Recreation & SportsGarden Club of Allegheny County: $1,350 · Environment
Education$28,500Other$22,275Arts & Culture$10,285International$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,400Environment$1,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $10,085 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $3,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGarden Club of Allegheny County: $1,350 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Granito Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Granito Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Granito Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph