Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gibb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$451kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GETTYSBURG COLLEGE$20,000
LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE$15,000
ECU FOUNDATION$10,000
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
HARCUM COLLEGE$5,300
WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,300
PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $30k → 9%NEUMANN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $20k → 11%ECU FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 8%RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE: $14k → 11%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $18k → 13%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $20k → 9%HARCUM COLLEGE: $5k → 10%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $18k → 11%PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $18k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $20k → 9%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $15k → 11%PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $18k → 9%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $10k → 11%PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $18k → 9%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $8k → 11%PITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $18k → 9%ST AUGUSTINE PREP: $10k → 11%ST AUGUSTINE PREP: $6k → 11%ST AUGUSTINE PREP: $5k → 11%ST AUGUSTINE PREP: $5k → 11%ST AUGUSTINE PREP: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 7 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$433k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+13%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $123k · revenue +16%
  • LV
    LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +23%
  • PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $58k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • NU
    NEUMANN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +13%
  • RS
    RICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
5
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
6
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Ursinus College

The mission of the college is to enable students to become independent, responsible, and thoughtful individuals through a program of liberal education. that education prepares them to live creatively and usefully, and to provide leadership…

Education
12
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin & Marshall College; the most unlike its peers is President and Trustees of Bates College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $123,000 · EducationGETTYSBURG COLLEGELEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $71,100 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGEPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $58,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGEFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $48,500 · EducationFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGENEUMANN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · Education+3 more: $20,600 · Education+3 moreSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $70,500 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYPITMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $31,000 · OtherPITMAN HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE: $14,000 · OtherRICHARD STOCKTON COLLEGE
Education$335,200Other$146,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $123,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $71,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $58,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $48,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEUMANN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARCUM COLLEGE: $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEUMANN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARCUM COLLEGE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gibb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gibb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gibb Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gibb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gibb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph