Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$503k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The George Lucas Educational Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to President And Fellows Of Harvard College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
4
’21
5
’22
4
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Education$5.7MScience & Tech$2.7MRecreation & Sports$200kSocial Science$100k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $503k
$50,499
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$503,048
THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM$150,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$50,499
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$50,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDER$50,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM: $150k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $880k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $90k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $150k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $39k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $594k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN: $75k → 10%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $700k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $50k → 27%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 14%THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM: $147k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $474k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $185k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN: $25k → 10%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $564k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $50k → 27%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%MATH ACTION: $75k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $88k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 8%MATH ACTION: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $80k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $503k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $100k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $136k → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 9 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$3.3M
$259k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.9M
  • TC
    THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2023 · $297k · revenue -27%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $200k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • S
    SFUSD
    one grant, 2020 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University; the most unlike its peers is Mathaction. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,718,048 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,363,996 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $946,870 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATHE CONCORD CONSORTIUM INCORPORATED: $296,698 · EducationNew York University: $200,000 · Education+2 more: $200,000 · EducationMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,900,234 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDER: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDERUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $100,998 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN: $100,000 · Other+2 more: $49,081 · OtherNorthwestern University: $200,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$5,725,612Other$2,760,313Recreation & Sports$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,718,048 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,363,996 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $946,870 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONCORD CONSORTIUM INCORPORATED: $296,698 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNew York University: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATHACTION: $100,000 over 2y, 56% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MATHACTION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George Lucas Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George Lucas Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • The Concord Consortium Incorporated: 37% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The George Lucas Educational Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The George Lucas Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Lucas Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph