Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$239k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$251kEducation$218kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$34kReligion$15kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $239k
$4,950
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Red Star Foundation$238,500
St Ignatius College Prep$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Chicago Blackhawks Foundation$4,950
American Cancer Society$2,500
Indiana Bulls Baseball$2,000
Batbusters Indiana$2,000
American Amusement Machine Association$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Diamond Sports Inc: $3k → 10%VetX: $3k → 10%Red Star Foundation: $239k → 12%Haiti House: $2k → 13%Siouxland Youth Pool League: $3k → 13%Blue N Gold: $5k → 14%Folds Of Honor: $10k → 5%226 Diamond Sports Inc: $2k → 9%Midwest Youth Hockey Association: $11k → 15%American Amusement Machine Association: $2k → 6%First Christian Church of Morris: $5k → 7%Audi Golf Classic: $500 → 8%Chicago Blackhawks Foundation: $5k → 14%Marine Toys for Tots Foundation: $10k → 7%Blue N Gold: $3k → 6%VetX: $2k → 10%Red Star Foundation: $10k → 12%Indiana Bulls Baseball: $2k → 5%St John Youth Baseball: $500 → 15%American Amusement Machine Association: $2k → 6%The University of Chicago: $25k → 14%Blue N Gold: $3k → 6%Food Bank of Northwest Indiana: $10k → 15%American Amusement Machine Association: $2k → 6%St Ignatius College Prep: $33k → 14%Food Bank of Northwest Indiana: $10k → 15%St Ignatius College Prep: $32k → 14%Food Bank of Northwest Indiana: $10k → 15%St Ignatius College Prep: $23k → 14%Food Bank of Northwest Indiana: $10k → 15%St Ignatius College Prep: $10k → 14%Batbusters Indiana: $2k → 15%St Ignatius College Prep: $10k → 14%Food Bank of Northwest Indiana: $10k → 15%St Ignatius Hockey Club: $4k → 14%Forest Ridge Academy: $19k → 15%St Ignatius Hockey Club: $2k → 14%Forest Ridge Academy: $18k → 15%Chicago Contemporary Dance Co: $10k → 14%Forest Ridge Academy: $18k → 15%Forest Ridge Academy - Gala: $15k → 15%Forest Ridge Academy: $8k → 15%Forest Ridge Academy: $8k → 15%FRA Golf Classic: $4k → 15%Forest Ridge Academy: $980 → 15%Hospice of Calumet: $980 → 15%Hospice of Calumet: $956 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
IN
CA
VA
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$506k · 9 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$506k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+45%

Still filing today

44%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    Red Star Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $249k · 79% of their budget
  • SI
    St Ignatius College Prep
    5× · 2021–2025 · $108k
  • FR
    FOREST RIDGE ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $71k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +52%
  • FR
    Forest Ridge Academy - Gala
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • MY
    MIDWEST YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Hawks Baseball Association

Teaching the ideals of sports, including sportsmanship, teamwork, fair play,discipline, respect, honesty, loyalty and courage; developing healthier, happier and more confident youth; combating juvenile delinquency by keeping youths…

Recreation & Sports
2
Indiana Bandits Inc

Provide youth baseball training,competitive games in a league system. stressing teamwork, sportsmanship and providing encouragement and information regarding student goals for playing sports at the college level. volunteer coaches and…

Recreation & Sports
3
United States Baseball Federation Inc

To foster the growth of amateur baseball in the united states and to organize national and international baseball competitions.

—
4
Chicago Baseball Cancer Charities Inc

The mission is to further cancer research. funds raised by the organization are donated to various medical and related organizations for the purpose of conducting cancer research.

Philanthropy
5
Summit City Sluggers Baseball Inc

The Summit City Sluggers Baseball Team is a developmental tool for athletes in the surrounding Fort Wayne area. This team is for athletes who have the goals for improving their skills against the best competition available in the area.

Recreation & Sports
6
Bloomington Normal Baseball Association

Coordination of Summer Baseball Programs for Bloomington/Normal Children and Young Adults

Recreation & Sports
7
5 Star Midwest

Baseball Training

—
8
Northville Baseball-Softball Assoc

The purpose of the association shall be to foster, promote, provide, and advance the acuse of baseball and softball for the children of the northville school district, the city of northville, and northville township (hereinafter referred…

Recreation & Sports
9
American Amateur Baseball Congress Inc

To enlarge and advance the scope of amateur baseball by stimulating interest and competition, and to provide a sound, experienced organization to assist and educate local groups in obtaining the maximum citizenship values.

—
10
Major League Baseball Charities Inc

To conduct activities to foster participation and interest in national or international amateur sports competition.

Philanthropy
11
Arabian Thunder Baseball Inc

Baseball team and league

Recreation & Sports
12
Burkburnett Blacksox Inc

Youth sports competition

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Bulls Baseball Inc; the most unlike its peers is Red Star Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Red Star Foundation Inc: $248,500 · OtherRed Star Foundation IncSt Ignatius College Prep: $107,600 · OtherSt Ignatius College PrepForest Ridge Academy - Gala: $15,000 · Other+16 more: $78,744 · Other+16 moreFOREST RIDGE ACADEMY INC: $70,636 · EducationFOREST RIDGE ACAD…University of Chicago: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Chi…FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $50,450 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $4,950 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · HealthBATBUSTERS INDIANA INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDIANA BULLS BASEBALL INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$449,844Education$95,636Food & Nutrition$50,450Philanthropy$14,950Health$2,500Youth Development$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRed Star Foundation Inc: $248,500 over 2y, 79% of budgetFOREST RIDGE ACADEMY INC: $70,636 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $50,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN AMUSEMENT MACHINE ASSOCIATION: $5,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $4,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA BULLS BASEBALL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN YOUTH BASEBALL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Red Star Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOREST RIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN AMUSEMENT MACHINE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Blackhawks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BATBUSTERS INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA BULLS BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN YOUTH BASEBALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to The Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gelatka Family Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph