Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ganatra Family Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$26kReligion$23kHealth$14kEnvironment$14kInternational$12kArts & Culture$5kEducation$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,022
Median grant
9
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
IFAW$2,057
GREENPEACE$1,034
MERCY SHIPS$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,030
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,027
PETA$1,022
OPERATION SMILE$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
JANE GOODALL SOCIETY$1,000
ANIMAL DEFENSE FUND$765
CARE USA$525
SAVE THE CHILDREN$500
SALESIAN MISSIONS INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($164k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($20k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $2k → 7%IFAW: $2k → 8%SAMARITANS HELPING HAND: $1k → 14%MERCY SHIPS: $1k → 12%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $4k → 14%HURLEY FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $1k → 9%CHERISH INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%CARE USA: $1k → 13%MARA ELPH PROJECT: $1k → 5%LKAL VIDYALAY FDN: $1k → 14%JANE GOODALL SOCIETY: $1k → 6%OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 10%PETA: $2k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 8%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $1k → 7%IFAW: $2k → 8%SAMARITANS HELPING HAND: $1k → 14%MERCY SHIPS: $1k → 12%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%HURLEY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $1k → 9%CHERISH INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%JANE GOODALL SOCIETY: $1k → 6%OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 10%PETA: $2k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 8%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $1k → 7%IFAW: $1k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%MERCY SHIPS: $1k → 12%CHERISH INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%PETA: $1k → 19%MERCY SHIPS: $1k → 12%CHERISH INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 10%PETA: $1k → 19%CHINMAYA MISSION: $20k → 16%CHERISH INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 10%PETA: $1k → 19%ASPCA: $2k → 17%AFRICAN WILDLIFE ORG: $1k → 14%BHARATLYA TEMPLE: $5k → 16%CHINMAYA MISSION: $1k → 16%GREENPEACE: $1k → 14%GREENPEACE: $1k → 14%GREENPEACE: $1k → 14%JANE GOODALL SOCIETY: $1k → 14%GIVE BUTTER BOSTON: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($20k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$20k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 25 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$206k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+73%

Still filing today

56%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsEnvironmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +129%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +60%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
9
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
10
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
11
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
12
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHINMAYA MISSION: $22,423 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSIONGREENPEACE INC: $7,102 · OtherJANE GOODALL SOCIETY: $6,043 · Other+16 more: $27,799 · Other+16 morePEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $9,134 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR T…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $7,057 · AnimalsINTERNATIONA…+1 more: $200 · AnimalsMercy Ships International: $5,120 · InternationalMercy Shi…OPERATION SMILE INC: $4,060 · InternationalOPERATION…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,305 · InternationalCOOPERATI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …Save The Children Federation Inc: $2,544 · InternationalSave The …+1 more: $250 · InternationalWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $7,140 · Environment+1 more: $200 · EnvironmentHURLEY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Civil RightsSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 · Health
Other$158,367Animals$24,391International$18,279Environment$7,340Civil Rights$7,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $9,134 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $7,140 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $7,102 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $7,057 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHURLEY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,120 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $4,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,305 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,544 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORD USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds CORD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ganatra Family Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ganatra Family Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ganatra Family Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph