How much does The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 give?

The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 reported 31 grants totaling $20,970 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 55 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

Who are The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: St Gertrude Parish ($117k), Best Friends Animal Society ($4k), The Anti-Cruelty Society ($3k).

Does The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 42% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr, AbbVie Foundation, Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund.

The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683

The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$7k

Largest

01What it funds

0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$142kAnimals$24kHuman Services$7kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$3kEnvironment$2kEducation$1kOther$0

02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200

Median grant

States reached

$311k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ST GERTRUDE PARRISH	$6,600
Individual grant recipient	$5,600
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY	$1,700
ANTI-CRUELTY	$1,500
MERCY HOME	$800
PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE	$600
LITTLE BROTHER - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY	$300
ASPCA	$300
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA	$300
TURNING POINT DONKEY RESCUE	$300
PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART	$300
PETA	$270
PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE MEDICINE	$250
INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE	$200
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT	$200

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$180k · 57 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$180k

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+21%

Still filing today

70%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthInternationalReligionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
8× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +31%
TA
The Anti-Cruelty Society
7× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +52%
HO
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC
6× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +36%

Funded once

PC
PAWS CHICAGO
one grant, 2017 · $2k
TS
THE SALVATION ARMY
one grant, 2017 · $1k
FO
FRIENDS OF PETRAITS
one grant, 2018 · $750

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Global Animal Partnership

Animals

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals

All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals

Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal

Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals

Illinois Animal Welfare Networkers Association

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Tribune Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

71/74

Grantees still filing

58/74

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$169,013Animals$17,795Human Services$4,300Health$2,300Environment$1,622Food & Nutrition$750Religion$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PC Fund for Animals Charitable TrWY26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · AbbVie Foundation · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Butchkie Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Galoney-Strubbe Charitable Foundation 19-Rp683’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home