How much did THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k3 grants · $20k
$10k–50k12 grants · $212k
$50k–250k1 grant · $74k
$250k+1 grant · $259k

$16,000

Median grant

States reached

$22M

Total assets

Largest grants

HPPC CHILDRENS MINISTRY$258,896
HIGHLAND PARK PRESB CHURCH$74,000
WYCLIFFE MINISTRIES$37,101
HOPE UNLIMITED$24,815
ANTIOCH PARTNERS$20,000
HPPC GOOD SHEPHERD$20,000
SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY AND LANGUAGE$17,500
HPPC CHURCH PLANT IN RESIDENCE$17,000
HPPC CALLING MINISTRY$16,000
PEAK STREET CHURCH$15,000
PARS THEOLOGICAL CENTRE$15,000
ESPERANZA MINISTRIES$10,000
HPPC GRACE LAKE HIGHLANDS CHURCH$10,000
DALLAS CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORP$10,000
EXODUS MINISTRIES$7,600

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.2M · 24 repeat orgs$385k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +58% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.2M

$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+58%

Still filing today

42%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionCrime & LegalInternationalEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CF
COUNCIL FOR LIFE
7× · 2017–2023 · $105k · revenue +289%
KC
KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE
5× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue +68%
IS
INSPIRE SPACES INSPIRE STUDENTS
4× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +125%

Funded once

ST
SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY & LANGUAGE IN
one grant, 2022 · $20k
PP
PRES PAN AMER SCHOOLgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +58%
FR
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

For the Nations Dc

We offer hope and help to refugee, asylumseeking, and immigrant families in the Washington D.C. metro area. We provide educational programs that help families learn English. We provide practical assistance and connections to community…

Education

Empowering Lives International

To empower the oppressed in East and Central Africa through training, education, and sharing the Gospel.

Religion

Christian Mission for the United Nations

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—

African Leadership Development

Overseeing a staff of 15 stipend workers in 2 orphan homes caring for 45 orphans in Zimbabwe and Mozambique and conducting the 18th Pastors and Wives Conferences in South Africa

Religion

Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global ministries is the coming together of three like-minded programs, all dedicated to developing Christian leadership around the world to spread the gospel through biblically-based leadership training program and supporting…

—

World Renew

World Renew's mission is to engage God's people in redeeming resources and developing gifts in collaborative acts of mercy, justice, and compassion. This work, which is focused on relief and community development.

—

L I F E Ministries Inc

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health

Reaching Souls International Inc

The Ministry provides training, accountability and financial support to aid native evangelists in developing nations to more effectively preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion

Living Water International

Living Water International (Living Water) exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services

International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion

UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ourcalling Inc and the most unlike its peers is Capitol Reef Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

16/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,127,275Human Services$232,193Philanthropy$75,000Education$48,000International$37,500Youth Development$37,364Religion$23,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX26.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · The Dan and Martha Lou Beaird Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Morning Star Family Foundation · Denman Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pauline and Austin Neuhoff · The New Covenant Foundation · The Leiser Family Foundation Inc · Breunig Family Foundation · Lee Ann and Steven Van Amburgh

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE HILLIER SCHOOL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~17 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 752449073 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE HILLIER SCHOOL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 51% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Foundation at Highland Park?

Find your warmest path to The Foundation at Highland Park through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation at Highland Park?

More from the funding graph

THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Foundation at Highland Park?

More from the funding graph