Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Flois and David J Landau Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$72kReligion$35kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$250Human Services$225Food & Nutrition$175International$100Education$39Other$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k12 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$175
Median grant
6
States reached
$334k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE SINAI$11,455
MT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
CARIO PRI CARE$3,400
Individual grant recipient$300
KEREN OR INC$200
SHRINER HOSPITALS$200
FOOD FOR THE POOR$175
IZENS INTEREST IN THE ARTS INC$150
SALVATION ARMY$100
ST JUDE$100
PINE STREET INN$50
PENN STATE$39
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$20
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PINE STREET IN: $200 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
MD
TN
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 12 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$108k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+32%

Still filing today

42%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $384 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $55k · revenue +163%
  • KO
    KEREN OR INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +72%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $250 · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • JF
    JDC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CP
    cardio pri care llc
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • TJ
    THE JAIN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
2
Rhode Island Quality Institute

To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…

Health
3
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
4
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
5
Diskin Orphan Home of Israel Inc

Distributing grants for support of orphans and their families, and to institutions that assist orphans.

International
6
Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation

Society of interventional radiology foundation (the foundation) is a scientific foundation dedicated to fostering research in interventional radiology for the purposes of advancing scientific knowledge, increasing the number of skilled…

Health
7
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
8
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
9
The Goldin Institute
Philanthropy
10
Inadcure Foundation Inc

Research towards possible treatment and cure for infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy

Health
11
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
12
The Scintillon Institute

To create breakthrough technologies that catalyze discoveries in a spirited home for collaborative science. With the goal to build and disseminate new capabilities, engineer unique technologies, and pioneer pathways to fresh discoveries,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jain Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE SINAI: $34,131 · OtherTEMPLE SINAICARIO PRI CARE: $6,800 · OtherCARIO PRI CAREJDC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherJDC FOUNDATIONadrianne arts foundation: $5,000 · Otheradrianne arts foundationcardio pri care llc: $3,400 · Othercardio pri care llc+13 more: $5,574 · Other+13 moreMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $55,000 · HealthMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION+3 more: $2,750 · HealthKEREN OR INC: $1,700 · EducationCITIZENS INTERESTED IN ARTS INC: $1,100 · Arts & CultureFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $175 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $100 · InternationalPINE STREET INN INC: $250 · Human Services
Other$59,905Health$57,750Education$1,700Arts & Culture$1,100International$275Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JAIN FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS INTERESTED IN ARTS INC: $1,100 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JAIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS INTERESTED IN ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Flois and David J Landau Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Flois and David J Landau Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 8% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flois and David J Landau Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph