· Private foundation
The Fhc Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SON CARE FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR MUSIC BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES | $15,000 |
| SALT LAKE CITY MISSION | $10,000 |
| UTAH FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SCSON CARE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $250k · revenue +178%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +23%
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- AAALPHA ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · $30k
- TRTHE ROAD HOMEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +121%
- SAST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINICone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -85%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Alpha Project for the Homeless (Alpha Project) was organized in February 1987 under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The mission of Alpha Project is to empower individuals, families, and…
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Emergency housing
Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake. Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…
To mobilize individuals and resources to deliver creative solutions to community problems. signifigant activities include operating homeless shelter, community food pantry and a community resource center to help those seeking employment.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…
Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.
housing and feeding the homeless
Providing for the needs of the dependent, neglected, and/or abused children of northwest georgia and helping them to live a healthier, happier and more productive life.
Homeless Shelter
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SON CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DIGNITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MUSIC BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Fhc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fhc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Fhc’s filings →