Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Everydaygood Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.6MHuman Services$2.5MYouth Development$1.6MEducation$908kHousing & Shelter$900kFood & Nutrition$450kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $675k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC$500,000
SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER$150,000
UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER$100,000
CORE - EL CENTRO$100,000
ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
PEARLS FOR TEEN GIRLS INC$50,000
RUNNING REBELS$50,000
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$50,000
ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$50,000
SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITIES HEALTH$50,000
AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$40,000
MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WI: $130k → 6%SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WI: $100k → 6%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $200k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $155k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $150k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $150k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $150k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $140k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $140k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $125k → 17%ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $50k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $65k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $100k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $100k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $100k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $100k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $100k → 17%UNITED COMMUNUTY CENTER: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.9M · 17 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$9.9M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+86%

Still filing today

76%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +114%
  • SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +36%
  • Core El Centro Incorporated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aurora Health Care Inc Group Return

To promote health, prevent illness, provide state-of-the art diagnosis and treatment. aurora is committed to improving the quality of health care and health outcomes, and providing services that are affordable and accessible.

—
2
Aurora Family Service Inc

Aurora family service partners with families to enhance their capability to anticipate, identify and manage challenges they face in their everyday lives through the integration of health, mental health, and social services providing…

Health
3
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
4
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
5
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
6
United Community Health Center

It is the mission of united community health center to provide comprehensive primary and preventive care to the uninsured, underinsured, and underserved of buena vista and sac counties.

Health
7
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
8
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
9
Kenosha Community Health Center Inc

Kenosha community health center, inc.'s purpose is to provide primary care and referral health services to disadvantaged and underserved populations and promote and ensure that basic primary health services are accessible to uninsured and…

Health
10
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
11
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
12
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN F…Core El Centro Incorporated: $1,030,000 · HealthCore El Centro Incorporated+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1,275,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENT…UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $550,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INCST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $400,000 · Human ServicesST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENE…SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $230,000 · Human ServicesSERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOU…+1 more: $1,044 · Human ServicesSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $907,500 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE H…SIXTEENTH STREET COMMUNITIES HEALTH: $250,000 · OtherSIXTEENTH STREET CO…KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $200,000 · OtherKINSHIP COMMUNITY F…KINSHIP MKE INC: $250,000 · OtherKINSHIP MKE INC+5 more: $88,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $670,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $400,000 · Youth DevelopmentRUNNING REBE…WISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterWISCONSIN …ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400,000 · Housing & ShelterACTS COMMU…Pearls for Teen Girls Inc: $510,000 · EducationAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,031,000Human Services$2,456,044Other$1,695,500Youth Development$1,070,000Housing & Shelter$900,000Education$510,000Philanthropy$360,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $1,275,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetCore El Centro Incorporated: $1,030,000 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $670,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $550,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPearls for Teen Girls Inc: $510,000 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetWISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC: $500,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE: $400,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $400,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $360,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $250,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetSERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $230,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,044 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Core El Centro Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Pearls for Teen Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANN CENTER FOR INTERGENERATIONAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MKE INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Francie Luke Silverman Foundation Under the F Silverman Charitable Tr · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Croen Foundation Inc · Weiss Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Everydaygood Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Everydaygood Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everydaygood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph