· Public charity
The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity
To foster the development of leaders and to promote academic excellence in higher education by providing students with scholarships and awards and by supporting educational projects and programs for their benefit.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $169,763 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $663,904 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $494,141 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OHIO DELTA COMPANY | $67,318 |
| INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION | $58,416 |
| GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION | $22,970 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI | $15,010 |
| PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY INC | $6,049 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IEINDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +94% · 31% of their budget
- CCCanonsburg Corporation - California Epsilon of Phi Kappa Psi House Corp7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +49% · 62% of their budget
- HCHOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA7× · 2017–2023 · $252k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- PLPENNSYLVANIA LAMBDA CORPORATION OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +909%
- OBOREGON BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing for college fraternity
College Fraternity
Provide housing and meeting place for members
Provide meals and housing for students while at depauw university
Provide housing for university students
Provide occupancy for live-in members of Phi Sigma Kappa WSU Fraternity.Provide Philanthropy for Community.
To maintain and grow the Phi Sigma Kappa chapter at RPI.
Social Club - Fraternity. 74 Members.
Provide Chapter House for Students
To provide and manage the fraternity house for university students.
To provide housing to student members.
Social Club - Fraternity. 168 Members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phi Kappa Psi Illinois Delta Association and the most unlike its peers is Housing Corporation for the Ca Gamma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INC ↗
- Who funds Canonsburg Corporation - California Epsilon of Phi Kappa Psi House Corp ↗
- Who funds PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds HOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA ↗
- Who funds PHI KAPPA PSI ILLINOIS DELTA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO DELTA COMPANY OF PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds Iowa Beta of Phi Kappa Psi ↗
- Who funds PURDUE UNIV PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PHI KAPPA PSI INDIANA BETA INC ↗
- Who funds CANONSBURG CORPORATION MICHIGAN ALPHA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA LAMBDA CORPORATION OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds OREGON BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity?
Find your warmest path to The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.