Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity

To foster the development of leaders and to promote academic excellence in higher education by providing students with scholarships and awards and by supporting educational projects and programs for their benefit.

$664k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $169,763 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $663,904 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $494,141 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
$22,970
Median grant
5
States reached
$83M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO DELTA COMPANY$67,318
INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION$58,416
GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION$22,970
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI$15,010
PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY INC$6,049
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PENNSYLVANIA LAMBDA CORP OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $33k → 16%CALIFORNIA EPSILON OF PHI KAPPA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $450k → 14%OKLAHOMA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $23k → 13%IOWA BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $66k → 10%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $805k → 11%MICHIGAN ALPHA PHI KAPPA PSI CORPORATION: $28k → 21%OREGON BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $23k → 10%PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY INC: $354k → 16%PHI KAPPA PSI INDIANA BETA INC: $60k → 18%OHIO DELTA COMPANY: $67k → 15%PURDUE PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION: $88k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $131k → 19%CALIFORNIA EPSILON OF PHI KAPPA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $396k → 14%OKLAHOMA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $21k → 13%IOWA BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $64k → 10%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $530k → 11%MICHIGAN ALPHA PHI KAPPA PSI CORPORATION: $25k → 21%GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $12k → 10%PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY INC: $6k → 16%PHI KAPPA PSI INDIANA BETA INC: $17k → 18%OHIO DELTA COMPANY: $63k → 15%PURDUE UNIVERSITY PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION: $77k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $43k → 19%CALIFORNIA EPSILON OF PHI KAPPA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $200k → 14%IOWA BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $31k → 10%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $229k → 11%GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $6k → 10%OHIO DELTA COMPANY: $48k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $41k → 19%CALIFORNIA EPSILON OF PHI KAPPA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $172k → 14%IOWA BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $16k → 10%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $113k → 11%GEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION: $6k → 10%OHIO DELTA COMPANY: $9k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $15k → 19%CALIFORNIA EPSILON OF PHI KAPPA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $117k → 14%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $106k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $9k → 19%INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORPORATION: $58k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF PHI KAPPA PSI: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
NC
OK

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$4.8M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+909%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +94% · 31% of their budget
  • CC
    Canonsburg Corporation - California Epsilon of Phi Kappa Psi House Corp
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +49% · 62% of their budget
  • HC
    HOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $252k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • PL
    PENNSYLVANIA LAMBDA CORPORATION OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +909%
  • OB
    OREGON BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phi Kappa Psi - Oregon Alpha Chapter S&T Fraternity Management

Housing for college fraternity

2
Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity - Ohio Delta Chapter

College Fraternity

3
Epsilon Psi House Corporation

Provide housing and meeting place for members

Education
4
Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity

Provide meals and housing for students while at depauw university

5
Kappa Delta Epsilon Iota House Corp

Provide housing for university students

6
Phi Sigma Kappa Chi Deuteron Wsu

Provide occupancy for live-in members of Phi Sigma Kappa WSU Fraternity.Provide Philanthropy for Community.

Membership Benefit
7
Phi Sigma Kappa

To maintain and grow the Phi Sigma Kappa chapter at RPI.

8
Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity

Social Club - Fraternity. 74 Members.

9
Sigma Tau of Kappa Delta Housing Associa

Provide Chapter House for Students

10
Missouri Alpha of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternal Corporation

To provide and manage the fraternity house for university students.

Education
11
Phi Gamma Delta Foundation

To provide housing to student members.

12
Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity

Social Club - Fraternity. 168 Members.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phi Kappa Psi Illinois Delta Association and the most unlike its peers is Housing Corporation for the Ca Gamma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INC — $1,842,018 · OtherINDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INCPHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $360,034 · OtherPHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITYPHI KAPPA PSI ILLINOIS DELTA ASSOCIATION — $245,828 · OtherPHI KAPPA PSI ILLINOIS DELTA ASSOCIATIONOHIO DELTA COMPANY OF PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $187,087 · OtherOHIO DELTA COMPANY OF PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITYIowa Beta of Phi Kappa Psi — $176,350 · OtherIowa Beta of Phi Kappa PsiPURDUE UNIV PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION — $164,855 · Other+4 more — $158,758 · OtherCanonsburg Corporation - California Epsilon of Phi Kappa Psi House Corp — $1,335,281 · Recreation & SportsCanonsburg Corporation - California Ep…HOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA — $251,733 · Recreation & SportsHOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA+1 more — $53,040 · Recreation & SportsGEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION — $47,344 · Education
Other$3,134,930Recreation & Sports$1,640,054Education$47,344

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINDIANA EPSILON HOUSE CORP INC — $1,842,018 over 6y, 31% of budgetCanonsburg Corporation - California Epsilon of Phi Kappa Psi House Corp — $1,335,281 over 7y, 62% of budgetPHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $360,034 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetHOUSING CORPORATION FOR THE CA GAMMA — $251,733 over 7y, 24% of budgetPHI KAPPA PSI ILLINOIS DELTA ASSOCIATION — $245,828 over 8y, 35% of budgetOHIO DELTA COMPANY OF PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $187,087 over 4y, 21% of budgetIowa Beta of Phi Kappa Psi — $176,350 over 5y, 67% of budgetPURDUE UNIV PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION — $164,855 over 2y, 12% of budgetPHI KAPPA PSI INDIANA BETA INC — $76,562 over 2y, 10% of budgetCANONSBURG CORPORATION MICHIGAN ALPHA CHAPTER — $53,040 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetGEORGIA ALPHA HOUSING CORPORATION — $47,344 over 6y, 32% of budgetPHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $44,074 over 2y, 57% of budgetOREGON BETA OF PHI KAPPA PSI ASSOCIATION — $5,494 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity?

    Find your warmest path to The Endowment Fund of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph