Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Texas · Public charity

The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation

The focus of the foundation is to assist region 12 schools with educational technology programs and to place instructional technology in the hands of students.

$77k
Granted FY2023
7
Itemized grants FY2023
7
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$59k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$8,400
Largest grant, FY2023
$9,943
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$978k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Dew Isd$9,9431n/a
Cy-Fair Isd$9,0552n/a
Groesbeck Isd$8,9151n/a
Walnut Springs Isd$8,4001n/a
La Vega Isd$7,7761n/a
Riesel Isd$7,4641n/a
Hillsboro Ind School District$7,2171n/a

Compare The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation with peer funders

About The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation

How much does The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation give?
The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation reported 7 itemized grants totaling $58,770, out of $76,886 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Dew Isd ($10k), Cy-Fair Isd ($9k), Groesbeck Isd ($9k).
Where is The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation based?
The Education Service Center Region 12 Technology Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $86k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Education Service Center Region 12 Technology’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home