Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Education Foundation of the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association Inc

Implementation of industry developed school-to-career programs through interaction with students, instructors and industry leaders.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE FLORIDA RESTAURANT AND LODGING ASSOCIATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $960,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,426,388 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $466,388 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k31 grants · $910k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUTTI PAZZI INC$50,000
GATORBITES TAIL & ALE$30,000
YUCATAN WATERFRONT$30,000
LANDRYS RESTAURANT$30,000
BLUE DOG BAR & GRILL$30,000
SANIBEL SUNSET BEACH$30,000
KEYLIME BISTRO CAPTIVA$30,000
CANTINA CAPTIVA$30,000
STEVE'S FAMOUS DINER$30,000
DUNES OWNER LLC$30,000
BACKSTREETS SPORTS BAR$30,000
NICE GUYS PINTS & PIES$30,000
RC OTTERS$30,000
YUCATAN BEACHSTAND$30,000
BUBBAS ROADHOUSE & SALOON$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOEY'S CUSTARD: $20k → 6%HIGH TIDES AT SNACK JACKS: $30k → 9%BUDGET INN DIPESH INC: $20k → 9%SEVENTH SOUTH CRAFT FOOD & DRINK: $30k → 10%NFK RESTAURANTS: $30k → 11%CAFE ONE: $20k → 12%CIELO RESTAURANT: $20k → 14%HIGH TIDES AT SNACK JACKS: $20k → 9%LANDRYS RESTAURANT: $30k → 9%SEVENTH SOUTH CRAFT FOOD & DRINK: $20k → 10%NFK RESTAURANTS: $20k → 11%STEVE'S FAMOUS DINER: $30k → 12%LANDRYS RESTAURANT: $20k → 9%BEST WESTERN BEACH RESORT: $30k → 11%STEVE'S FAMOUS DINER: $20k → 12%FARLOW'S ON THE WATER: $20k → 9%MYERSIDE: $20k → 11%GATORBITES TAIL & ALE: $30k → 11%BEST WESTERN BEACH RESORT: $20k → 11%SANIBEL DELI AND COFFEE FACTORY: $30k → 11%JR RESTAURANT GROUP LLC: $20k → 11%TEH4 INC: $30k → 11%PINK SHELL BEACH RESORT & SPA: $20k → 11%SANIBEL DELI AND COFFEE FACTORY: $20k → 11%FT MYERS BEACH VACATIONS LLC: $20k → 11%TEH4 INC: $20k → 11%LATINOS MARKET PLACE: $20k → 11%YUCATAN WATERFRONT: $30k → 11%BLUE DOG BAR & GRILL: $30k → 11%TUTTI PAZZI INC: $50k → 11%SANIBEL INN OWNER: $30k → 11%LIGHTHOUSE CAFE OF SANIBEL ISLAND: $30k → 11%OVER EASY CAFE: $30k → 11%PINOCCHIO'S ORIGINAL ITALIAN ICE CREAM: $30k → 11%ISLAND PIZZA COMPANY: $30k → 11%DUNES OWNER LLC: $30k → 11%THE SANIBEL CAFE: $30k → 11%SANIBEL SUNSET BEACH: $30k → 11%SHALIMAR COTTAGES AND MOTEL: $30k → 11%YUCATAN BEACHSTAND: $30k → 11%BACKSTREETS SPORTS BAR: $30k → 11%NICE GUYS PINTS & PIES: $30k → 11%BUBBAS ROADHOUSE & SALOON: $30k → 11%KEYLIME BISTRO CAPTIVA: $30k → 11%CANTINA CAPTIVA: $30k → 11%STILWELL MANAGEMENT CAPTIVA ISLAND INN: $30k → 11%RC OTTERS: $30k → 11%CITY TAVERN: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 28 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$1.4M
$320k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BACKSTREETS SPORTS BAR
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • DO
    DUNES OWNER LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • BR
    BUBBAS ROADHOUSE & SALOON
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • LM
    LATINOS MARKET PLACE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • FM
    FARMERS MARKET RESTAURANT
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • TM
    THE MUCKY DUCK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20232024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+48 more — $1,840,000 · Other+48 more
Other$1,840,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph