Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Economic Development Partnership of Alabama Foundation Inc

Supporting organization for economic development partnership of alabama, inc.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF ALABAMA FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUIPNX INC$50,000
BAER ENTERPRISES LLC DBA ZONE PROTECTS$50,000
AUTONOMA INC$25,000
DEVCLARITY LLC$25,000
NEPHSOL INC$25,000
CROUX INC$25,000
KIMMIE STYLZ LLC$25,000
HUNTSVILLE MAGAZINE LLC$25,000
VIVOSPHERE LLC$12,500
NAIAD INC$12,500
PAY4ME INC$10,000
HYDROPHOS SOLUTIONS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EDIFY ONLINE CORPORATION: $25k → 7%MAHO LLC: $63k → 12%BAER ENTERPRISES LLC DBA ZONE PROTECTS: $50k → 13%SYCAMORE PHYSICIAN CONTRACTING LLC: $28k → 13%FLASHTRACT INC: $50k → 15%ALABAMA SAWYER LLC: $100k → 16%VB IDEAS LLC: $50k → 19%VENTORLUX LLC: $100k → 22%MOSES D WEAVER JR DBA NATURE'S OWN CAROL'S SPRING WATER: $50k → 32%SELMA GOOD COMPANY LLC: $107k → 33%TENNIOT INC: $40k → 15%HOUSE PLANT COLLECTIVE: $50k → 16%LINC RESEARCH INC: $100k → 11%SOUTHERN SWADDLE: $26k → 13%ACCLINATE GENETICS INC: $50k → 11%MOXIE IOT LLC: $100k → 16%GLOBAL INSPECTIONS LLC: $50k → 19%APEX PRO LLC: $51k → 16%DOMESTIQUE COFFEE LLC: $50k → 16%APEX PRO LLC: $50k → 16%BIRMINGHAM COMPOST LLC: $50k → 16%INFLUENCER LLC: $50k → 16%JAMES A CAVALE III DBA INFLCR LLC: $50k → 16%GLOW LLC: $50k → 16%BOOK-IT LEGAL LLC: $51k → 16%CONSERV SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 16%CONSERV SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 16%POINTZ INC: $50k → 16%WYNDY LLC: $81k → 16%CONCUR MESSAGING INC: $50k → 16%CERFLUX INC: $100k → 16%CERFLUX INC: $50k → 16%MICHAEL LYNCH DBA CHONEX LLC: $85k → 16%XPERTDOX LLC: $50k → 16%THE WEALTH EDIT: $50k → 16%MOTIONMOBS LLC: $38k → 16%WEELTH INC: $50k → 16%O3 INSIGHT INC: $100k → 16%QUANTALYTIX INC: $100k → 16%VENDRIX INC: $50k → 16%ROBERT SHUFFLEBARGER DBA TRIALTUS BIOSCIENCE LLC: $50k → 16%TRIALTUS BIOSCIENCE LLC: $50k → 16%IMMEDIATE SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 16%CONSERV SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 16%AERBETIC INC: $50k → 16%GLOW LLC: $50k → 16%IMMEDIATE SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 16%CLEARMIND INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 20 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
45

Total granted

$1.4M
$2.1M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $228k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CERFLUX INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $150k
  • CS
    CONSERV SOLUTIONS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $150k
  • AP
    APEX PRO LLC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $101k

Funded once

  • SG
    SELMA GOOD COMPANY LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $107k
  • VL
    VENTORLUX LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • OI
    O3 INSIGHT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CERFLUX INC — $150,000 · OtherCONSERV SOLUTIONS INC — $150,000 · Other+72 more — $3,463,050 · Other+72 more
Other$3,763,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph