Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Easton Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$469k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$311k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$5.0MInternational$21kSocial Science$21kHousing & Shelter$11kPhilanthropy$5kReligion$500
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $311k
$2,569
Median grant
3
States reached
$169M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORI ART MUSEUM$310,965
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$150,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$3,225
ST PETERS CHURCH CHELSEA$2,569
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$2,500
CENTER FOR CULTURAL INNOVATION$1,560
J PAUL GETTY TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($4.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($671k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTRE POMPIDOU INC: $3.4M → 14%ST PETERS CHURCH CHELSEA: $3k → 17%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $13k → 14%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $21k → 9%CENTER FOR CULTURAL INNOVATION: $2k → 14%ST PETERS CHURCH CHELSEA: $3k → 17%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $1k → 14%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $150k → 17%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF ST PETER: $500 → 17%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 17%COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 17%COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 17%COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3k → 17%ART TABLE INC: $8k → 17%TEL AVIV MUSEUM AMERICAN FRIENDS INC: $150k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $150k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $150k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $77k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $73k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $70k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($671k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Japan$311k · 1 grant
Switzerland$225k · 1 grant
Austria$135k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$707k · 4 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$707k
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+31%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $314k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropySocial SciencePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Museum of Modern Art
    4× · 2017–2025 · $670k · revenue -20%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +134%
  • COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTRE POMPIDOU INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3.4M
  • KB
    KUNSTMUSEUM BASEL
    one grant, 2023 · $225k
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Berggruen Institute
Education
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
7
International Contemporary Art Foundatio
Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies

The Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE) is dedicated to enhancing the United States' image abroad through American Art. Founded as a public-private, non-partisan partnership in 1986, FAPE works with the U.S. Department…

Arts & Culture
11
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
12
The American Federation of Arts Inc

The american federation of arts initiates and organizes a national and international program of art exhibitions, publications, and educational activities to benefit the museum community and enrich the public's experience and understanding…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Modern Art; the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTRE POMPIDOU INC: $3,382,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTRE POMPIDOU INCMORI ART MUSEUM: $310,965 · OtherMORI ART MUSEUMKUNSTMUSEUM BASEL: $225,000 · OtherKUNSTMUSEUM BASEL+4 more: $152,450 · OtherMuseum of Modern Art: $670,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern A…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEU…+1 more: $1,560 · Arts & CultureTEL AVIV MUSEUM'S AMERICAN FRIENDS INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $20,737 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $20,500 · Social ScienceARTTABLE INC: $7,500 · Public Benefit
Other$4,070,915Arts & Culture$821,560Philanthropy$171,737Social Science$20,500Public Benefit$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $670,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEL AVIV MUSEUM'S AMERICAN FRIENDS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $20,737 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $11,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTTABLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCenter for Cultural Innovation: $1,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Easton Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Easton Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Easton Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Easton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Easton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph