Skip to content
The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$657kEducation$108kHuman Services$61kHealth$44kPhilanthropy$22kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$7kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$2,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$139k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH$53,000
CONGREGATION BETH TORAH$26,498
MIKDASH ELIYAHU$22,600
SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD$13,333
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$10,000
NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CNTR$10,000
MISCELLANEOUS DONATIONS UNDER 1000$9,575
YAD YOSEF$9,000
MOSDOT BETUSHAN$7,100
SEPHARDIC CENTER FOR RABBINICAL STUDIES$6,300
CONG MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL$6,252
Individual grant recipient$5,300
MORRIS FRANCO CANCER CENTER$4,500
OUR PLACE$3,600
SAFRA SYNAGOGUE OF NEW JERSEY$2,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $2k → 17%SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 11%LIFE'S WORC INC: $10k → 6%A TIME: $100 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $20k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%OSTAR: $180 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $171 → 20%MISASKIM: $180 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $200 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
CA
VA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$730k · 74 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
94

Total granted

$730k
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+46%

Still filing today

27%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +5%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue +57%
  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • LW
    LIFE'S WORC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • SO
    SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
4
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
10
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
11
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
12
Bet Midrash Ohel Torah

Operation of a post-secondary educational institution providing rabbinical training with a focus on sephardic/middle eastern jewish tradition.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/49
Grantees still filing
40/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $345,857 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHCONGREGATION BETH TORAH: $87,089 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH TORAHMIKDASH ELIYAHU: $38,800 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS DONATIONS UNDER 1000: $25,609 · Other+139 more: $234,616 · Other+139 moreSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $22,150 · ReligionSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $16,133 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $3,102 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $3,000 · ReligionSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $2,951 · Religion+5 more: $3,205 · ReligionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $20,671 · Human ServicesLIFE'S WORC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $5,200 · Human ServicesISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $2,000 · Human Services+4 more: $660 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $24,300 · Youth DevelopmentDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $5,801 · Youth DevelopmentOUR PLACE INC: $3,600 · Youth Development+1 more: $108 · Youth DevelopmentSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $8,100 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,400 · HealthMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $5,400 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,036 · PhilanthropyAMUDEI CHESED INC: $1,100 · Philanthropy+5 more: $1,547 · PhilanthropyBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $7,100 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2,672 · EducationSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $1,710 · Education+4 more: $300 · Education
Other$731,971Religion$50,541Human Services$38,531Youth Development$33,809Health$29,150Philanthropy$22,683Education$11,782

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $24,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $22,150 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $20,671 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,036 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $16,133 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLIFE'S WORC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $8,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $6,301 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $5,801 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $3,102 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $2,951 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2,672 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $1,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $1,201 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad of Thailand Inc: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV ECHAD INC: $501 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $386 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTebah Educational Services Inc: $202 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $198 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOtsar Family Services Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $146 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $124 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $108 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZaka Rescue & Recovery Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE'S WORC INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …E R G FoundationJewish Communal FundSamuel & Mollie Jemal…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…The Setton FoundationCabasso Family Founda…Chehebar Family Found…Haddad Brands Family …Altoon Sutton Memoria…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY64.9× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Haddad Brands Family Foundation · Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Beit Rambam Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dweck and Rahmey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home