How much did THE DOROTHY BABCOCK FAMILY CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THE DOROTHY BABCOCK FAMILY CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2020

—

2021

ligonier valleyrescue

2022

ligonier valleyrescue

2023

ligonier valleyrescue

2024

ligonier valleyrescue

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $46k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$611k

Total assets

Largest grants

MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
NOVA UKRAINE$5,000
RAZOM INC$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$2,500
PERFECT EARTH PROJECT$2,000
LONG ISLAND CARES$2,000
LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
WESTMORELAND FOOD BANK$2,000
PROJECT EATS$2,000
HAMPTON'S COMMUNITY OUTREACH$2,000
ENCINAL HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
FRESH AIR FUND$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$248k · 25 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +139% since the first grant, against -70% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$248k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%

-70%

Still filing today

40%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RAZOM INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +25128%
NU
NOVA UKRAINE
3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +32546%
LI
LONG ISLAND CARES
4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +181%

Funded once

UN
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $5k
FU
FLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
one grant, 2021 · $2k
MP
MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE
one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition

Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services

Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition

Field & Fork Network

Food and farming organization committed to build a thriving, healthy community through local food

—

The Lincoln Park Conservancy Inc

Grow a sustainable organic garden

Arts & Culture

Loaves and Fishes

"rescue" excess perishable food and deliver it to charitable organizations

Food & Nutrition

Historic Hudson Valley

Hhv celebrates the history and culture of the hudson valley.

Arts & Culture

New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful, see schedule o.

Arts & Culture

The Last Green Valley Inc

As caretakers, the last green valley connects people with the abundant and diverse natural, historical and cultural resources within eastern connecticut and south-central massachusetts. we advocate to sustain our region's legacy for future…

Environment

Woodstock Land Conservancy

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment

Bk Rot Inc

BK Rot is a community centered closed loop fossilfuel free approach to hauling and compossting food waste in New York City

Environment

Pinnacle Prevention Corp

To cultivate a just food system and opportunities for joyful movement.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Eats Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nova Ukraine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

11/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$198,513International$38,000Human Services$15,500Animals$6,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Environment$5,000Arts & Culture$3,500Public Benefit$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE DOROTHY BABCOCK FAMILY CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 264235269 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LIGONIER VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Dorothy Babcock Family Charitable?

Find your warmest path to The Dorothy Babcock Family Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE DOROTHY BABCOCK FAMILY CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Dorothy Babcock Family Charitable?

More from the funding graph

THE DOROTHY BABCOCK FAMILY CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Dorothy Babcock Family Charitable?

More from the funding graph