Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald E Thompson Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$541kHousing & Shelter$13kReligion$10kYouth Development$8kScience & Tech$5kRecreation & Sports$3kEnvironment$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$321k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEMIDJI STATE U FBO GRUENER SOPHIA$3,000
UM COLUMBIA FBO LEAKE KARI$3,000
NW MO STATE UNIV FBO GRAVES BAILEY$3,000
MO STATE U FBO LUCAS KYLIE$3,000
UM COLUMBIA FBO AGEE MADELINE$3,000
UNIV OF AR FBO LECKBEE MADISSON$3,000
UM COLUMBIA FBO RHODES GRACE$3,000
WILLIAM WOODS FBO MILLER ELAINA$2,000
MOBERLY COMM FBO NORVELL HARLEY$2,000
UM COLUMBIA FBO LEMMON ASHTON$2,000
MISSOURI S T FBO RAUSCH LUKE$2,000
MARYVILLE FBO WEHMEYER CHRISTINE$2,000
UM COLUMBIA FBO BYRD BENJAMIN$2,000
NW MO ST UNIV FBO GILBERT GWENYTH$2,000
MISSOURI S T FBO THOMPSON OWEN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%POPE YOUNG CLUB: $2k → 8%FOLDS OF HONOR: $1k → 15%NEW FAITH MINISTRIES: $600 → 5%WARRENTON COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 8%THE KEY YOUTH INC: $5k → 10%JOY FM: $4k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 21%TROY KIWANIS CLUB: $1k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 10%NORTHEASTERN U FBO BICKER ALLISON: $1k → 10%SACRED HEART HOME AND SCHOOL: $1k → 10%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1k → 10%AIM HIGH ELITE GYMNASTICS: $1k → 10%KIWANIS CLUB OF TROY: $1k → 10%TROY YOUTH SOCCER: $1k → 10%ST STEPHEN METHODIST CHURCH: $750 → 10%ST STEPHEN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $750 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%THE KEY YOUTH INC: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%TROY FFA: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%LINCOLN CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%ST STEPHENS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $500 → 10%TROY FFA ALUMNI: $500 → 10%SACRED HEART HOME AND SCHOOL: $100 → 10%NEW SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 10%HAWK POINT ATHLETIC CLUB: $500 → 10%HAWK POINT LIONS CLUB: $300 → 10%FRIEDENS UCC: $500 → 10%FRIEDENS UCC: $500 → 10%NW MO ST UNIV FBO GILBERT GWENYTH: $1k → 10%ST ALPHONUS PTA: $1k → 10%ST ALPHONSUS PTA: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 79 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

79 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
109

Total granted

$357k
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+204%

Still filing today

1%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MO SCIENCE TECH FBO DANIELS ALEX
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k
  • VC
    VASSAR COLL FBO LAN NGUYEN ALEX
    5× · 2019–2023 · $8k
  • TS
    TRUMAN STATE UNIV FBO ILLY DANIELL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $8k

Funded once

  • WC
    WARRENTON COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIV OF CENTRAL MO FBO MICH NORTON
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • MS
    MO SCIENCE TECH FBO DANIELS ALE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 213 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+198 more: $572,750 · Other+198 moreTHE KEY YOUTH INC: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$572,750Youth Development$5,500Education$1,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE KEY YOUTH INC: $5,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KEY YOUTH INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald E Thompson Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald E Thompson Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 213 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald E Thompson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph