· Private foundation
The Davis Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| jewish family services of silicon v | $70,000 |
| Hillel Silicon Valley | $70,000 |
| Jewish Silicon Valley | $35,000 |
| American Beethoven Society | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| J Leaders | $10,000 |
| California Botanical Garden | $10,000 |
| Capriccio | $10,000 |
| KQED | $10,000 |
| KDFC | $10,000 |
| Silicon Valley Jewish film festival | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 37% of The Davis Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 61%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HSHillel Silicon Valley7× · 2019–2025 · $265k
- JFjewish family services of silicon v3× · 2023–2025 · $170k
- TATHE AMERICAN BEETHOVEN SOCIETY CO SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Davis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Davis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Davis Family’s filings →