Skip to content

· Private foundation

The David Robinson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$310kHealth$120kReligion$35kCommunity Improvement$25kEmployment$20kArts & Culture$10kFood & Nutrition$10kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACEPOINT NORTHEAST CHURCH$20,000
DUKE CHILDERENS HOSPITAL$20,000
HARVEST CHURCH OF HAMPTON$15,000
THE MISTY COPELAND FOUNDATION$10,000
BETTER FUTURES INSTITUTE$10,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$10,000
SKEW THE SCRIPT$10,000
FOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE MISTY COPELAND FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%The V Foundation for Cancer Research: $100k → 8%NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY: $300k → 13%HARVEST CHURCH OF HAMPTON: $15k → 14%SA TALENT: $20k → 16%GRACEPOINT NORTHEAST CHURCH: $20k → 16%BETTER FUTURES INSTITUTE: $10k → 16%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $10k → 16%SKEW THE SCRIPT: $10k → 16%ADMIRALS BASKETBALL: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
4
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Universidad Del Sagrado Corazon Inc

The universidad del sagrado corazon (sagrado) is an independent, nonprofit, catholic university, committed to the education of the whole person through strong foundation in the liberal arts. sagrado is part of puerto ricos oldest private,…

Education
7
Arts & Design Alumni Reserch

The mission of the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project (SNAAP) is to maximize the success and impact of creatives in society by driving evidence-informed change in training and illuminating the value of arts and design education.

Education
8
Free Trade Alliance San Antonio

To develop and enhance the international trade-related economic development of the san antonio area through foreign investment, trade development, and advocacy.

—
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
11
Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

Education
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sa Talent Inc Sa Works; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $300,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacSA TALENT INC SA WORKS: $20,000 · EducationSA TALENT INC SA WORKS+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE V FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONDUKE CHILDERENS HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherDUKE CHILDERENS HOS…GRACEPOINT NORTHEAST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherGRACEPOINT NORTHEAS…HARVEST CHURCH OF HAMPTON: $15,000 · OtherHARVEST CHURCH OF H…BETTER FUTURES INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · OtherBETTER FUTURES INST…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…THE MISTY COPELAND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE MISTY COPELAND …SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BA…THE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementFOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$330,000Health$100,000Other$95,000Community Improvement$25,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSA TALENT INC SA WORKS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSkew The Script: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MISTY COPELAND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David Robinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David Robinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David Robinson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph