Skip to content
The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$62kHealth$43kFood & Nutrition$34kHuman Services$30kReligion$28kInternational$16kHousing & Shelter$7kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$7,500
THE EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY$6,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR$4,900
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH$3,400
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TRENT$1,250
SALESIAN MISSIONS$1,000
THE COOPER FOUNDATION$1,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$575
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$500
CHOP FOUNDATION$500
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL$500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%d'angelo foundation: $10k → 6%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $1k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $5k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 22%THE EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%d'angelo foundation: $10k → 6%SALESIAN MISSIONS: $1k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $5k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 22%THE COOPER FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $5k → 13%MERCY HOME FDN INC: $2k → 7%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $5k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $4k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $4k → 13%ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH: $3k → 7%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $4k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $2k → 28%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $4k → 13%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $8k → 19%THE EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $7k → 17%the ehlers-danlos society: $5k → 17%the ehlers-danlos society: $5k → 17%the ehlers-danlos society: $5k → 17%THE EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
PA
NJ
KY
MD
AR
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$225k
$3k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +498%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +98%
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • MH
    MERCY HOME FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • SO
    SOC OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL PARISH OF
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
12
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ehlers-Danlos Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $62,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INC: $12,000 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INCSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $8,000 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES+15 more: $35,975 · Other+15 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $34,400 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $31,500 · HealthEHLERS-DANLOS SOC…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…D'ANGELO FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyD'ANGELO …CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$125,475International$46,400Health$35,500Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $34,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $31,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetD'ANGELO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COOPER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds D'ANGELO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The David and Kathleen M Wojcik Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David and Kathleen M Wojcik’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home