Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The David and Judy Fleischer Foundation

Supports the mission of united jewish appeal-federation of jewish philanthropies of new york, inc., (uja-federation of new york).

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$225kReligion$206kInternational$164kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$20kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $61,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $85,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM$26,800
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEWISH CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%JEWISH CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%JEWISH CHILDCARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$645k · 7 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$645k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+58%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +5%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    3× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +117%
  • TT
    THE TIKVAH FUND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
The Jerusalem Connection
4
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
5
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
6
Sherit Isroel
7
The Tzedaka Fund
Philanthropy
8
The Keren Rachaim Fund
9
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
One for Israel

One for israel's purposes are to unite u.s. and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the gospel in israel, to raise funds for evangelism and gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for israel's…

12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $225,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWIS…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $110,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN D…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $54,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATIO…THE TIKVAH FUND — $100,000 · EducationTHE TIKVAH FUNDAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $10,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-…CONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM — $106,400 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEP…JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK — $30,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$235,000International$164,000Education$110,000Other$106,400Human Services$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $225,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND — $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The David and Judy Fleischer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David and Judy Fleischer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The David and Judy Fleischer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph