Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Darwin and Lorene Cole Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$757kHuman Services$140kReligion$102kPublic Benefit$80kEducation$79kHealth$70kArts & Culture$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $143,786, the rows itemized in this filing. The $180,127 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,341 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $133k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USD 325$35,000
CITY OF PRAIRIE VIEW$20,000
PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER$19,258
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
HUCK BOYD FOUNDATION$14,000
MAJESTIC COMMUNITY THEATER FND$10,000
1ST CHRISTIAN CHURCH GRANT$10,000
PHILLIPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FND$10,000
DISCOVER PHILLIPSBURG MAIN STREET$6,500
PHILLIPS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS$2,500
PHILLIPS COUNTY FAIR BOARD$1,500
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PASS THRU ENTITIES$28
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 10 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +248% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$345k
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+248%
0%

Still filing today

10%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U3
    USD 325
    3× · 2019–2024 · $79k
  • PC
    PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +248%
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2024 · $68k

Funded once

  • PC
    PHILLIPS COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • LC
    LOGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • PC
    PHILLIPS/ROOKS COUNTY EXTENSION
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USD 325: $79,260 · OtherUSD 325PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $68,333 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPHILLIPS COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEMS: $59,185 · OtherPHILLIPS COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEMSPHILLIPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FND: $48,000 · OtherPHILLIPS COUNTY COMMUNITY FNDCITY OF PRAIRIE VIEW: $23,500 · OtherLOGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other1ST CHRISTIAN CHURCH GRANT: $20,000 · OtherPHILLIPS/ROOKS COUNTY EXTENSION: $17,000 · Other+20 more: $134,570 · Other+20 morePHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $76,126 · Human ServicesPHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CE…HUCK BOYD FOUNDATION: $64,000 · Human ServicesHUCK BOYD FOUNDATION
Other$469,848Human Services$140,126

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $76,126 over 4y, 13% of budgetHUCK BOYD FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetPHILLIPS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPHILLIPS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $8,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILLIPSBURG CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUCK BOYD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Darwin and Lorene Cole Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Darwin and Lorene Cole Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $160k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Darwin and Lorene Cole’s filings →

More from the funding graph