Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cooley Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$148k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$321kPhilanthropy$148kReligion$64kArts & Culture$21kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $148k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NPT DONOR-ADVISOR FUND FOR UBS$147,872
RALLY FOUNDATION$10,000
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION$8,000
ARCS FOUNDATION$1,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NPT DONOR-ADVISOR FUND FOR UBS: $148k → 7%EPISCOPAL RELIEF DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%CHURCH OF REDEEMER: $22k → 13%THE ARTISANS VILLAGE: $5k → 13%CHURCH OF REDEEMER: $12k → 13%PLAZA ARTS CENTER: $4k → 13%CHURCH OF REDEEMER: $12k → 13%PLAZA ARTS CENTER: $3k → 13%CHURCH OF REDEEMER: $12k → 13%THE PLAZA ARTS CENTER: $2k → 13%CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $5k → 13%PLAZA ARTS CENTER: $1k → 13%RALLY FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%PUBLIC BROADCASTING ATLANTA: $2k → 13%GA PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $2k → 13%GA PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $2k → 13%GA PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $2k → 13%PUBLIC BROADCASTING ATLANTA: $1k → 13%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOU: $92k → 13%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOU: $72k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $51k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$397k · 10 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$397k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+32%

Still filing today

30%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOU
    2× · 2017–2018 · $164k
  • GS
    Georgia State University Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $102k · revenue +42%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF REDEEMER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $59k

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TA
    THE ARTISANS VILLAGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOU: $164,000 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNPT DONOR-ADVISOR FUND FOR UBS: $147,872 · OtherNPT DONOR-ADVISOR FUND FOR UBSCHURCH OF REDEEMER: $58,500 · OtherCHURCH OF REDEEMERARCS FOUNDATION INC: $16,600 · Other+6 more: $33,200 · Other+6 moreGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $101,500 · EducationGeorgia State University…GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION …RALLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PLAZA ARTS CENTER INC: $9,270 · Recreation & SportsTHE ARTISANS VILLAGE INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$420,172Education$121,500Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$9,270Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $101,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PLAZA ARTS CENTER INC: $9,270 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RALLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PLAZA ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTISANS VILLAGE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cooley Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cooley Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cooley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph