Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cody Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$188kHousing & Shelter$80kReligion$67kArts & Culture$50kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$33kFood & Nutrition$7kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,000
ST THOMAS HERITAGE FUND$12,000
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$10,000
CORPUS CHRISTI PARISH CHURCH$7,000
TOGETHER IN MISSION$2,500
BEL-AIR BAY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND$1,000
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S GREATER LOS ANGELES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 15 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$456k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+11%

Still filing today

33%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +486%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +41%
  • WF
    WESTSIDE FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +348%

Funded once

  • VD
    VERBUM DEI HS DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • LS
    LA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS WLA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin county.

—
2
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
3
Catholic Charities of California

To promote the social welfare of california, with particular regard for the poor and marginalized through the twelve diocesan charities agencies.

—
4
People's Bank of Commerce Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

To advance UC Santa Barbara's capacity to educate future generations, unlock new discoveries, and enrich California and the world.

Education
6
California Association of Food Banks

To eliminate hunger in california.

Food & Nutrition
7
Pasadena Community Foundation

Pasadena Community Foundation (PCF) strives to improve and enrich lives of people in the greater Pasadena area through: the establishment and management of charitable funds with an emphasis on permanently endowed funds that benefit the…

Philanthropy
8
Central Pacific Bank Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of Santa Barbara County through good nutrition by providing nourishment, acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies (10 million pounds per year) and giving education to solve…

Food & Nutrition
10
Ucla Foundation

The mission of the ucla foundation is to actively promote philanthropy and manage donated resources for the advancement of ucla.

Education
11
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Fidelity charitable seeks to facilitate, support and increase charitable activities in the following areas; health and human services, children, youth and families; social welfare; education; scientific research; culture, arts, and…

Community Improvement
12
Laguna Beach Community Foundation

The Laguna Beach Community Foundation strengthens our community by encouraging philanthropy. We provide expertise and resources to assist local charities, connect donor passions with nonprofit needs, and work with local professional…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The People Concern; the most unlike its peers is Bel-Air Bay Club Charitable Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONPACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS: $60,000 · OtherPACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESSST THOMAS HERITAGE FUND: $50,420 · OtherST THOMAS HERITAGE FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVERBUM DEI- SCHOOL: $32,500 · OtherVERBUM DEI- SCHOOLALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $24,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONROMAN ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES A CORPORATION SOLE: $22,000 · Other+13 more: $48,200 · Other+13 moreBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $50,000 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AM…THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $6,000 · Food & NutritionBEL-AIR BAY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $3,000 · EducationALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $3,000 · Health
Other$447,120Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$21,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Education$3,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS: $60,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEL-AIR BAY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC PALISADES TASK FORCE ON HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BEL-AIR BAY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cody Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cody Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cody Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph