Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Clark Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$634k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MCrime & Legal$716kHealth$630kEducation$617kYouth Development$248kScience & Tech$195kRecreation & Sports$138kArts & Culture$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $455k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA$101,500
LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY$100,000
CHRIST'S HOME FOR CHILDREN$75,000
UNITED DISABLITIES SERVICES$65,000
LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER$60,000
Individual grant recipient$53,000
MUSSER FOUNDATION$41,600
LANCASTER SCIENCE FACTORY$37,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$20,000
TENNIS CENTRAL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
LANCASTER CNTY CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$15,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN$10,000
AARON'S ACRES$6,000
ADVANTAGE LANCASTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $854k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AARON'S ACRES: $6k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $6k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $6k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $129k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $127k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $125k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $125k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $83k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $60k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $58k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $50k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 27 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$5.1M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+109%

Still filing today

37%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $704k · revenue +15%
  • UD
    UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $552k · revenue +105%
  • LG
    LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • REACH OUT AND READ INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +109%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • PT
    PUBLIC TENNIS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster Emergency Medical Services Association

To provide comprehensive, skillful, cost effective emergency and non- emergency health care services to the lancaster community while continuing to evolve with changing health care needs.

Health
2
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
3
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
4
Lancaster Community Safety Coalition

Enhance public safety and the quality of life in lancaster by engaging the community and advancing current crime prevention strategies.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Library System of Lancaster County

Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the member libraries in order to effectively serve our communities

—
6
Lancaster General Health

Provides managerial and financial support to its controlled organizations and is also responsible for undertaking activities designed to advance the general health of the community.

Health
7
Lancaster Country Day School

The mission of lancaster country day school is to empower students to explore their passions, find purpose, and become the best versions of themselves.

Education
8
Care-Net of Lancaster

The best healthcare, for the lowest cost, for the most people.

—
9
The Community Library Inc

The lancaster community library is a center for the cultural, intellectual, and recreational pursuits of the community. through its materials, programs, and services, the library promotes literacy, provides lifetime learning opportunities,…

Education
10
Lancaster Preschool

Lancaster preschool believes that the preschool is an extension of the home environment where children can learn new skills, interact with teachers and peers, and experience hands-on learning opportunities through developmentally…

Education
11
Lancaster Medical Society Foundatio
—
12
The New School of Lancaster Dba New School Montessori

The mission is to facilitate the unfolding of each child's unique potential through an outstanding montessori education that enables a child to meet future challenges, and that encourages a love of learning, independent thinking, social…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster General Hospital; the most unlike its peers is The Musser Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA: $817,900 · OtherCASACHRIST'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $684,000 · OtherCHRIST'S HOME FOR CHILDRENTHE MUSSER FOUNDATION: $286,900 · OtherTHE MUSSER FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $214,525 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTENNIS CENTRAL: $128,300 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $120,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN: $90,000 · Other+18 more: $310,830 · Other+18 moreLANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER: $806,250 · Human ServicesLANCASTER DAY CARE…AARON'S ACRES: $48,000 · Human ServicesAARON'S ACRESLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $704,300 · EducationLANCASTER PUBLI…+2 more: $13,500 · EducationUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES: $552,100 · HealthUNITED DISABIL…LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthLANCASTER GENE…LANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER: $232,000 · Arts & CultureADVANTAGE LANCASTER: $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentPUBLIC TENNIS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,652,455Human Services$854,250Education$717,800Health$652,100Arts & Culture$232,000Youth Development$18,000Environment$10,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER: $806,250 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $704,300 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES: $552,100 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MUSSER FOUNDATION: $286,900 over 9y, 60% of budgetLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER: $232,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetTENNIS CENTRAL: $128,300 over 6y, 17% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER HEALTH CENTER: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAARON'S ACRES: $48,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetADVANTAGE LANCASTER: $18,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC TENNIS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSSER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TENNIS CENTRAL ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AARON'S ACRES ↗
  • Who funds ADVANTAGE LANCASTER ↗
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC TENNIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · The Steinman Foundation · The Abigail L Longenecker Memorial Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Thomas a and Georgina T Russo Foundation · Kalas Foundation · Richard S & Ann B Barshinger Family Fdn · United Way of Lancaster County · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clark Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clark Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clark Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph