Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy

The mission of the claremont institute is to restore the principles of the american founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life.

$134k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$25k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$18M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$25k100%
FY20242$16k100%
FY20233$60k100%
FY20212$56k50%
FY20201$110k0%
FY20191$110k0%
FY20181$110k0%
FY20171$125kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$510kPublic Benefit$102k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chapman University$485,00050%
Society for American Civic Renewal Inc$26,2481n/a
Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc$25,00010%
Legal Insurrection Foundation$25,00012%
American Moment Inc$25,00012%
John Jay Society$10,00017%
Palm Beach Freedom Institute Inc$10,00014%
Art & Literature Foundation$5,66114%

Compare The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy with peer funders

About The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy

How much does The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy give?
The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy reported 1 itemized grants totaling $25,000, out of $133,500 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (83%), Public Benefit (17%).
Who are The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Chapman University ($485k), Society for American Civic Renewal Inc ($26k), Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc ($25k).
Does The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy based?
The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home