Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund In

To protect water quality throughout the region by acquiring ecologically significant watershed land and by educating citizens as to how they can help preserve the environment and open space on watershed land.

$127k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172022.

Education$94kEnvironment$68kFood & Nutrition$50kCommunity Improvement$41kHealth$10kOther$95k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $74,066 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,643 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,577 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH CENTRAL CT REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY$14,066
SOLAR YOUTH$10,000
SAVE THE SOUND$10,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY$10,000
GREATER NEW HAVEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-NH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCIENCE FAIR$10,000
NEW HAVEN URBAN RESOURCES INITIATIVE$10,000
WINNETT FOOD FOREST$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund In’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 95% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund Inlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 9 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$296k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+31%

Still filing today

78%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER NEW HAVEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +3%
  • NH
    NEW HAVEN - URBAN RESOURCES INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +68%
  • NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ANSONIA NATURE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • CS
    CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • WC
    WESTVILLE COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
3
North Central Conservation District Inc

To provide leadership and take initiatives for locally led conservation with the goal to protect soil, water and other natural resources of north central connecticut.

Environment
4
Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District Inc

To promote the sound use and management of natural resources. the district provides technical assistance and education in soil and water conservation and control.

Environment
5
Winchester Historical Society
6
Newtown Forest Association Inc

The Newtown Forest Association is the oldest private land trust organization in Connecticut. It has been dedicated for one hundred years to securing for the residents of Newtown and for posterity generally the benefits derived from open…

Environment
7
Haddam Land Trust Inc

Preservation of natural resources in the town of haddam, connecticut.

Environment
8
Highville Charter School

Close-knit, community rooted, and culturally affirming PreK-12 charter school that offers small classrooms, caring and healthy relationships, data-driven curriculum and programming focused on whole child social, emotional, and academic…

Education
9
Earthplace Inc

Dedicated to nature discovery and environmental learning through education, conservation and science.

Environment
10
Alewife Cove Conservancy

Preserve, Protect and Enhance the Alewife Cove estuary, water, soils fauna and flora

Environment
11
Save New Canaan Inc

Save New Canaan Inc. (the Corporation) was formed to promote sustainable and appropriate development, as well as to advocate for the protection of open spaces, wetlands and other public trust goods, such as road, water and sewer…

Environment
12
Sustainable Ct Inc

To inspire, support, and certify sustainability actions by connecticut towns and cities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Ecology Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Winnett Food Forest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#21#7#15#13#14
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr13%15%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%55%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr19%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%84%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr19%0%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
10%
508/5,035

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER NEW HAVEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $50,750 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER …CT FUND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT — $20,000 · OtherCT FUND FOR THE ENVIRONMENTSOUTH CENTRAL CT REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY — $19,566 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL CT REGIONAL WATE…SHALOM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $5,000 · OtherSOLAR YOUTH INC — $40,000 · EducationSOLAR YOUTH INCST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC — $34,378 · EducationST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY I…Yale University — $10,018 · EducationYale UniversityWESTVILLE COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $9,752 · EducationWESTVILLE COMMUNITY NURSERY S…GATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC) — $30,000 · EnvironmentGATHER NEW HAVEN INC …SAVE THE SOUND — $20,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDFRIENDS OF ANSONIA NATURE CENTER INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF ANSONIA NA…FRIENDS OF HAMMONASSET INC — $7,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF HAMMONASSE…NEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Food & NutritionNEW HAVEN ECOLO…Winnett Food Forest — $10,000 · Food & NutritionWinnett Food Fo…NEW HAVEN - URBAN RESOURCES INITIATIVE INC — $41,000 · Community ImprovementNEW HAVEN - …CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 · Health
Other$95,316Education$94,148Environment$67,500Food & Nutrition$50,000Community Improvement$41,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE GREATER NEW HAVEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $50,750 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetNEW HAVEN - URBAN RESOURCES INITIATIVE INC — $41,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSOLAR YOUTH INC — $40,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC — $34,378 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGATHER NEW HAVEN INC (FORMELY NEW HAVEN LAND TRUST INC) — $30,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYale University — $10,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ANSONIA NATURE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTVILLE COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $9,752 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAMMONASSET INC — $7,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Newalliance Foundation IncCT21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Sustainable Ct Inc · New Haven Green Fund Inc · United Way of Greater New Haven Inc · Yale University · Patagoniaorg · In Our Backyards Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • New Haven - Urban Resources Initiative Inc100% of income from government
  • Save the Sound37% of income from government
  • Solar Youth Inc19% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation12% of income from government
  • Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc)11% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund In?

Find your warmest path to The Claire C Bennitt Watershed Fund In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $187k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph