Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$478kArts & Culture$157kAnimals$61kCrime & Legal$42kFood & Nutrition$11k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$21,062
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HACKLEY SCHOOL$36,160
HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY$36,160
DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA$21,062
NY LEGAL AID SOCIETY$21,062
IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE$11,031
BULLPEN WAY STATION & SANCTUARY LTD$10,000
CHEETAH CONSERVATION FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $11k → 8%DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA: $21k → 10%Hackley School: $74k → 9%NY LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $21k → 17%BULLPEN WAY STATION & SANCTUARY LTD: $10k → 23%Colorado College: $4k → 9%CHEETAH CONSERVATION FUND: $10k → 9%Darmouth College: $25k → 10%David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc: $20k → 10%Historic Hudson Valley: $37k → 9%NY Legal Aid Society: $21k → 17%Darmouth College: $25k → 10%Hackley School: $37k → 9%Darmouth College: $24k → 10%HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY: $36k → 9%Darmouth College: $18k → 10%HACKLEY SCHOOL: $36k → 9%Darmouth College: $8k → 10%Hackley School: $34k → 9%Historic Hudson Valley: $30k → 9%Historic Hudson Valley: $29k → 9%Historic Hudson Valley: $25k → 9%Hackley School: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
NY
CT
CA
CO
VA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$713k · 6 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$713k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HACKLEY SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $206k · revenue +7%
  • HH
    HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $157k · revenue +28%
  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
2
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
5
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
6
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
10
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
11
Red River Zoological Society

As conservation leaders, the red river zoo connects our community to nature and inspires people to help save species.

Animals
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Legal Aid Society; the most unlike its peers is Bullpen Way Station & Sanctuary Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YALE UNIVERSITY: $166,730 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYDarmouth College: $100,923 · OtherDarmouth CollegeHACKLEY SCHOOL: $205,962 · HealthHACKLEY SCHOOLHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY: $156,797 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEYTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $41,062 · AnimalsTHE DAVID…Cheetah Conservation Fund: $10,000 · AnimalsCheetah C…BULLPEN WAY STATION & SANCTUARY LTD: $10,000 · AnimalsBULLPEN W…THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $42,018 · Crime & LegalIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $11,031 · Food & NutritionTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $4,000 · Education
Other$267,653Health$205,962Arts & Culture$156,797Animals$61,062Crime & Legal$42,018Food & Nutrition$11,031Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHACKLEY SCHOOL: $205,962 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY: $156,797 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $42,018 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $41,062 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $11,031 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBULLPEN WAY STATION & SANCTUARY LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christopher Bogart & Elizabeth O'Connell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph