· Public charity
The Catholic Association Foundation
The mission of the Organization is to educate the public on the wisdom of the Catholic Church on social and moral matters.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $830k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Neuro Kids Inc | $1,000,000 |
| The Heights Inc | $750,000 |
| Knights of Columbus | $600,000 |
| Ava Maria School of Law Foundation | $205,000 |
| Napa Institute Legal Foundation | $200,000 |
| National Catholic Prayer Breakfast | $115,000 |
| In Shifra's Arms | $75,000 |
| Biking for Babies | $75,000 |
| The Federalist Society | $60,000 |
| COLLIS Institute for Catholic Thought and Culture | $50,000 |
| The Center for Study of Technology and Society | $50,000 |
| International Catholic Jurist Forum | $35,000 |
| Jerome Lejeune Foundation | $20,000 |
| McLean Board for Catholic Liberal Education | $15,000 |
| Association for Catholic Formation | $11,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IDINTERNATIONAL DOMINICAN FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +386% · 40% of their budget
- TCTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA2× · 2019–2020 · $2.9M · revenue +26%
- THTHE HEIGHTS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +25%
Funded once
- TIThe Institute for the Psychological Sciences Incone grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue +24%
- LPLA PROMESA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +3%
- FCFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)
The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…
The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…
The Paulist Press was founded to provide Catholic literature and resources for the the religious use of parishes, institutions, individuals and other religious bodies to further the educational and mission goals of the Christian faith and…
The institute of catholic culture is an adult catechetical organization, faithful to the magisterium of the catholic church. the institute seeks to fulfill its mission by offering educational programs structured upon the classical liberal…
Conference
University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church
Creating public scholarship through mixed media.
Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…
To promote the teaching of the Western Tradition, its relationship to other traditions and its importance in the modern era, through educational courses, resources and teacher training.
To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelis Center for Law & Policy and the most unlike its peers is Center for Thomas More Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOMINICAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE HEIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS ↗
- Who funds NEURO KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST MEDICUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THOMAS MORE STUDIES ↗
- Who funds SUDAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SERVUS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds NAPA INSTITUTE LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NAPA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds Avila Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY PROJECT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARISE FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds The Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CATHOLIC PRAYER BREAKFAST INC ↗
- Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF FAMILY AND CULTURE ↗
- Who funds FIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds AVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC JURISTS FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds IN SHIFRAS ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds SENT INSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP ↗
- Who funds The Given Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LEONINE FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BIKING FOR BABIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Knights of Columbus · John Templeton Foundation · The Ortner Family Foundation · Eternal Word Television Network Inc · Timothy and Sheila Patton Family Charitable Trust · Alliance Defending Freedom · Robert and Bernarda Neal Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Catholic Association Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Catholic Association Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Catholic Association Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.