Skip to content

· Public charity

The Carson Strong Foundation

The carsonstrong foundation is committed to improving the lives of children and families impacted by cancer and other significant life challenges.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$251kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$7kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $29,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$748k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTORY GALLOP$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $25k → 17%CVCA BOOSTERS: $21k → 13%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $67k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%CVCA BOOSTERS: $6k → 13%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $40k → 17%VICTORY GALLOP: $20k → 13%UH RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $40k → 17%STEWARTS'S CARING PLACE: $16k → 13%BOY SCOUTS TROOP 385: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 3 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$168k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
-15%

Still filing today

33%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $107k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +74%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $26k

Funded once

  • UR
    UH RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $33k
  • SC
    STEWARTS CARING PLACE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $107,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSUH RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $40,000 · OtherUH RAINBOW BABIES & CHILDRENS HOSPITALST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $32,956 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTEWARTS CARING PLACE: $25,000 · OtherSTEWARTS CARING PLACE+2 more: $13,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR…VICTORY GALLOP INC: $20,000 · HealthVICTORY GALLOP INCSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $15,905 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE IN…
Other$243,956Health$70,905

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORY GALLOP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $15,905 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY GALLOP INC ↗
  • Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carson Strong Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carson Strong Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carson Strong’s filings →

    More from the funding graph