Skip to content
The Cardinal McIntyre Fund for Charity at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Cardinal McIntyre Fund for Charity

THE CARDINAL MCINTYRE FUND FOR CHARITY (the fund) was formed to assist the "neediest of the needy" by raising and maintaining funds to reimburse parishes of the archdiocese of los angeles for emergency financial assistence they give to individuals and families.

$6.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
83
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 83 grants below total $5,938,027, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,401,670 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $463,643 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $232k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $635k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.8M
$11,385
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY ANGELS CHURCH$1,535,443
ST MONICA CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,188,063
DEPARTMENT OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$552,595
SACRED HEART CHURCH- ALTADENA$475,000
ST BEDE THE VENERABLE CHURCH$246,000
ASSUMPTION OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY SCHOOL$195,000
SAN GABRIEL PASTORAL REGION$161,554
SANTA RITA CATHOLIC CHURCH$144,000
ST DIDACUS CATHOLIC CHURCH$117,228
DOLORES MISSION$95,846
ST RITA ES$81,000
ST MARY OF THE ASSUMPTION CH-WHITTER$66,647
ST MARTIN OF TOURS$58,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH-POMONA$52,000
CATHEDRAL CHAPEL$51,980
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST MARY OF THE ASSUMPTION CH-STA MARIA: $11k → 14%ST MONICA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1.2M → 14%ST JOSEPH CHURCH-HAWTHORNE: $20k → 14%RJM CATERING: $14k → 14%ST JOSEPH CHURCH- LA PUENTE: $16k → 14%SACRED HEART OF JESUS CHURCH- LOS ANGELES: $38k → 14%ST PHILLIP NERI CHURCH: $21k → 14%HOLY ANGELS CHURCH: $1.5M → 14%ASSUMPTION OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY SCHOOL: $195k → 14%ASSUMBLESS VIRGIN MARY CHURCH-PASADENA: $11k → 14%CATHEDRAL OF OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS: $50k → 14%OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH: $22k → 14%ST MEL CHURCH: $11k → 14%ST PETER CHURCH-1039 N: $14k → 14%FR RASMINE EL HAJJE: $10k → 14%HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL-SO PASADENA: $24k → 14%ST MARTIN OF TOURS: $58k → 14%ST ANTHONY CHURCH-SAN GABRIEL: $16k → 14%SACRED HEART CHURCH- ALTADENA: $475k → 14%LIFT INTERNATIONAL (ALTADENA): $15k → 14%ST IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA CHURCH: $32k → 14%ST FRANCES OF ROME CHURCH: $20k → 14%SANTA RITA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $144k → 14%ST RITA ES: $81k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $17k → 14%ALL SAINTS CHURCH: $12k → 14%OUR LADY OF LORETTO CHURCH: $18k → 14%MATER DOLOROSA PASSIONIST RETREAT CENTER: $20k → 14%ST DIDACUS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $117k → 14%SAN GABRIEL PASTORAL REGION: $162k → 14%DOLORES MISSION: $96k → 14%ST CAMILLUS CENTER FOR PASTORAL CARE: $30k → 14%DOLORES MISSION CHURCH: $17k → 14%ST MARIA GORETTI: $16k → 14%ST PATRICK CHURCH- LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%ST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCH: $20k → 14%ST BEDE THE VENERABLE CHURCH: $246k → 14%ST MADELEINE CHURCH: $29k → 14%SACRED HEART CHURCH-POMONA: $52k → 14%DEPARTMENT OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $553k → 14%MARY IMMACULATE CHURCH: $11k → 14%ST ANDREW CHURCH: $32k → 14%ST BASIL CHURCH: $39k → 14%SAINT KATERI TEKAKWITHA: $19k → 14%ST ANDREW ES: $30k → 14%EPIPHANY CHURCH: $11k → 14%CATHEDRAL CHAPEL: $52k → 14%ST MARY OF THE ASSUMPTION CH-WHITTER: $67k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2025–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2025 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cardinal McIntyre Fund for Charity?

Find your warmest path to The Cardinal McIntyre Fund for Charity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cardinal McIntyre Fund for Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home