Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2021
19
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $116k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
20
10
21
0
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Philanthropy$2.7MHuman Services$70kHealth$66kEducation$25kEnvironment$22kRecreation & Sports$15kPublic Benefit$13kFood & Nutrition$13k
02FY2021 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k16 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RVNA HEALTH$15,454
Individual grant recipient$12,319
WATER WATCH$12,076
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$8,305
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND$7,908
AMERICAN CAMP ASSOCIATION$7,809
WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILL$7,224
COMPASSION & CHOICES$5,000
RIDGEFIELD MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
AMERICAN CAMP ASSOCIATION$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,500
WILTON LIBRARY$4,500
HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILL$2,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $20k → 12%WILTON LIBRARY: $5k → 9%ACLUF-CT: $12k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILL: $7k → 13%AMERICAN CAMP ASSOCIATION: $8k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $20k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER: $70k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILL: $3k → 13%AMERICAN CAMP ASSOCIATION: $5k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $10k → 12%RIDGEFIELD VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $30k → 9%AMERICAN CAMP ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $10k → 12%RVNA HEALTH: $15k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $7k → 12%RIDGEFIELD MEALS ON WHEELS: $8k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $7k → 12%RIDGEFIELD MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF RIDGEFIELD COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $1k → 9%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $4k → 12%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $4k → 12%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $2k → 12%BURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND: $2k → 12%WATER WATCH: $12k → 12%THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 12%WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $8k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE: $3k → 12%THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
4
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

9
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Ridgefield Community Programs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,635,908 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCBURCH-SAFFORD CHARITABLE FUND — $91,421 · OtherBURCH-SAFF…WOMEN'S CENTER — $70,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CE…RVNAHEALTH INC — $45,454 · OtherRVNAHEALTH…AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $15,009 · OtherAMERICAN C…RIDGEFIELD MEALS ON WHEELS — $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,319 · OtherWATER WATCH — $12,076 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $10,024 · Other+3 more — $11,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $7,908 · HealthHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,505 · Arts & CultureWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $7,500 · EnvironmentCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $5,000 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF RIDGEFIELD COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$2,635,908Other$280,303Health$10,908Arts & Culture$10,505Environment$7,500Civil Rights$5,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,635,908 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC — $45,454 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $15,009 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,505 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $7,908 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Columbia Gorge — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF RIDGEFIELD COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc11% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy4% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Burch-Safford Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph