Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Mississippi · Public charity

The Bulldog Club Inc

To promote and support the mississippi state university athletic program.

$39M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$28,903,293
Largest grant, FY2025
$28,903,293
Organizations funded a year
2 to 2
FY2023 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$81M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Bulldog Club Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$39M0%
FY20242$49M0%
FY20232$40Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Philanthropy$127MEducation$1.5M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mississippi State University$126,939,8303n/a
Mississippi State University Foundation Inc$1,500,00021%

Compare The Bulldog Club Inc with peer funders

About The Bulldog Club Inc

How much does The Bulldog Club Inc give?
The Bulldog Club Inc reported 2 grants totaling $39,294,715 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 2 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.
What does The Bulldog Club Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (99%), Education (1%).
Who are The Bulldog Club Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: Mississippi State University ($127M), Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ($1.5M).
Does The Bulldog Club Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Bulldog Club Inc based?
The Bulldog Club Inc is based in MS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bulldog Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home