Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Texas · Public charity

The Buffalo Council Inc

To provide scholarships to students of west texas a&m university through the wtamu foundation.

$17k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$16,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$16,500
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$324k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations The Buffalo Council Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 31% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$17k0%
FY20233$106k33%
FY20222$239kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$329kCommunity Improvement$33k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Downtown Amarillo Inc$33,000166%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($329k), not named here.

Compare The Buffalo Council Inc with peer funders

About The Buffalo Council Inc

How much does The Buffalo Council Inc give?
The Buffalo Council Inc reported 1 grants totaling $16,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does The Buffalo Council Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (91%), Community Improvement (9%).
Who are The Buffalo Council Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Downtown Amarillo Inc ($33k).
Does The Buffalo Council Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Buffalo Council Inc based?
The Buffalo Council Inc is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Buffalo Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home