Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bruce Krier Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$695k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$9.1MEnvironment$587kArts & Culture$239kRecreation & Sports$97kFood & Nutrition$67kReligion$58kHuman Services$35kHousing & Shelter$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $570k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$91,871
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$695,000
RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT$350,000
OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT$164,270
PORT WASHINGTON-SAUKVILLE SCHOOLS$145,000
NORTHERN OZAUKEE SCHOOL DISTRICT$96,000
ELKHART LAKE GLENBEULAH SCHOOL$91,871
DIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL$73,076
NORTHERN OZAUKEE SCHOOL DISTRICT$44,000
OOSTBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT$44,000
RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT$44,000
Individual grant recipient$42,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $56k → 9%DIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $73k → 11%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $695k → 17%DIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $64k → 11%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $695k → 17%BELLS OF ST MARY'S: $50k → 6%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $115k → 6%DIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $53k → 11%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $385k → 17%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $100k → 6%DIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $370k → 17%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $75k → 6%OOSTBERG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $459k → 9%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $250k → 17%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $65k → 6%OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $164k → 9%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $200k → 17%OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $50k → 6%OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $130k → 9%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $125k → 17%OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $120k → 9%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $125k → 17%OOSTBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $103k → 9%ST MARCUS SCHOOL: $75k → 17%OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $80k → 9%OOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $80k → 9%OOSTBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $44k → 9%OOSTBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $44k → 9%OOSTBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $44k → 9%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $100k → 6%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $50k → 6%RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER: $50k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON-SAUKVILLE SCHOOLS: $145k → 6%LAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP: $100k → 6%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $394k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $350k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $315k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $250k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $163k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 9%RANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $70k → 9%ELKHART LAKE GLENBEULAH SCHOOL: $92k → 9%ELKHART LAKE-GLENBEULAH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $89k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON SHEBOYGAN MARSH: $75k → 9%ELKHART LAKE-GLENBEULAH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $68k → 9%ELKHART LAKE-GLENBEULAH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $63k → 9%CEDAR GROVE - BELGIUM SCHOOL DISTRICT: $56k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.2M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
22

Total granted

$9.2M
$805k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-12%

Still filing today

35%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $405k · revenue +80%
  • RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $238k · revenue +8%
  • LAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $162k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • OC
    OOSTBERG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $459k
  • LU
    LAKELAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $56k · revenue -12%
  • BO
    Bells of St Mary's Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
2
Southeast Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Obtain and manage land of ecological significance.

Environment
3
Owasco Lake Watershed Management Council Inc

To coordinate actions for protecting and restoring the health of owasco lake and its watershed to ensure that owasco lake will serve as a source of public drinking water, a recreational asset, an economic driver, and an important natural…

Environment
4
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
5
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
6
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
7
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
8
Milwaukee Audubon Society Inc

Protect and restore Wisconsin's natural heritage and ecology through active leadership, education and stewardship

Environment
9
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
10
Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

Environment
11
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
12
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riveredge Nature Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cg At Play Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2,981,500 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCHRANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,686,375 · OtherRANDOM LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICTNORTHERN OZAUKEE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,125,860 · OtherNORTHERN OZAUKEE SCHOOL DISTRICTOOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $573,770 · OtherOOSTBURG SCHOOL DISTRICTOOSTBERG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $459,000 · OtherDIVINE SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $348,384 · Other+26 more: $1,886,469 · Other+26 moreOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $405,000 · EducationLAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC: $162,000 · EducationLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $56,000 · EducationFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $25,000 · EducationRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $237,500 · EnvironmentTHE FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON: $100,000 · EnvironmentRESTORING LANDS INC: $52,185 · EnvironmentMequon Nature Preserve Inc: $30,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentOZAUKEE COUNTY FARM BUREAU COOPERAT: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSAUKVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionCG AT PLAY INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsLUXEMBOURG AMERICAN CULTURAL SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePLYMOUTH ART FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY: $22,000 · Public Benefit
Other$9,061,358Education$648,000Environment$424,685Food & Nutrition$47,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Arts & Culture$25,000Public Benefit$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $405,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetRIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC: $237,500 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetLAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC: $162,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON: $100,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $56,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORING LANDS INC: $52,185 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBells of St Mary's Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMequon Nature Preserve Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCG AT PLAY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY: $22,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUXEMBOURG AMERICAN CULTURAL SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSAUKVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPLYMOUTH ART FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HARRINGTON BEACH STATE PARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetRCS EMPOWERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RESTORING LANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bells of St Mary's Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mequon Nature Preserve Inc ↗
  • Who funds CG AT PLAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE COUNTY FARM BUREAU COOPERAT ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUXEMBOURG AMERICAN CULTURAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAUKVILLE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI30.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Sartori Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · West Bend Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Cedarburg Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bruce Krier Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bruce Krier Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bruce Krier Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bruce Krier Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bruce Krier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph