· Private foundation
The Brecher Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Shavei Chevron Institutes | $2,500 |
| Talmud Torah Siach Yitchok | $1,800 |
| Davis Memorial Fund - VOID | $1,800 |
| Bais Medrash of Harborview | $1,500 |
| Hatzalah | $500 |
| Soralah Foundation | $500 |
| Soralah Foundation | $500 |
| Bais Medrash of Harborview | $500 |
| American Friends of Torah Umesorah of Latinoamerica | $250 |
| Israel Purim Fund | $100 |
| American friends of Ramat Beit Shemesh | $100 |
| Mesivta of Long Beach | $50 |
| Kulanu | $50 |
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2023.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Brecher Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Brecher Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Brecher’s filings →