Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Biomimicry Institute

The purposes of this corporation shall be to naturalize biomimicry in the culture by promoting the transfer of ideas, designs, and strategies from biology to sustainable human systems design.

$202k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Community Improvement$177kEnvironment$100kEducation$67kScience & Tech$25kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $106,489 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $202,373 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,884 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$67,189
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OR FOUNDATION$67,189
YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT$39,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARUGA TECHNOLOGIES: $25k → 11%NETWORK FOR GOOD: $5k → 14%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT: $40k → 12%THE OR FOUNDATION: $177k → 15%YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT: $39k → 12%THE OR FOUNDATION: $67k → 15%YALE SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT YALE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $44k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$17k · 38% · 12 people

Stated purpose: GIFT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS PROGRAM TO SUPPORT TEXTILE BIODEGRADABILITY AND TEXTILE WASTE TOXICITY RESEARCH

East Asia and the Pacific$9k · 21% · 2 people
North America (Canada and Mexico)$9k · 21% · 2 people
Sub-Saharan Africa$9k · 20% · 1 person

Stated purpose: GRANTS FOR STUDENTS' ASSISTANCE ON THE GHANA PILOT OF DESIGN FOR TRANSFORMATION PROJECT RESEARCHING TEXTILE WASTE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 4 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OR FOUNDATION LTD — $243,922 · EducationTHE OR FOUNDATION LTDYale University — $100,000 · EducationYale UniversityARUGA TECHNOLOGIES — $25,224 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOOD — $5,198 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$343,922Other$25,224Public Safety & Disaster$5,198

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE OR FOUNDATION LTD — $243,922 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetYale University — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $5,198 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Biomimicry Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph