Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beyer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$2kEnvironment$2kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$500Animals$250Housing & Shelter$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
4
States reached
$22k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRENNA PELECIN FDN$300
PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMM F$250
WASHINGTON LEE LAW SCHOOL$200
GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE$200
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVATORY$150
ALBION COLLEGE$150
WOUNDED WARRIORS$100
HABITAT FOR HUMMANITY$100
COMMON GROUND$100
DETROIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $300 → 8%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 9 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$8k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+14%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +66%
  • GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +60%
  • MA
    MURRAY ART GUILD
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +227%

Funded once

  • PS
    PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS COMM FOUND
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $250
  • MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
2
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
3
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
4
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—
5
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
6
Midlands Humane Society

To protect and nurture companion animals and enrich the lives of people who love them.

Animals
7
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
8
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
9
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
10
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
11
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
12
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Murray Art Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $1,900 · OtherGRACE CENTERS OF HOPEPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMM F: $1,050 · OtherPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMM FTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $500 · OtherTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECTPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS COMM FOUND: $500 · OtherPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS COMM FOUNDWASHINGTON LEE LAW SCHOOL: $400 · OtherWASHINGTON LEE LAW SCHOOLHABITAT FOR HUMMANITY: $300 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $250 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS: $200 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,150 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conserva…MURRAY ART GUILD: $1,350 · Arts & CultureMURRAY ART GUILDDetroit Historical Society: $100 · Arts & CultureDetroit Historic…THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $500 · Human ServicesBRENNA PELECIN FDN: $300 · HealthCOMMON GROUND: $100 · HealthMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 · AnimalsALBION COLLEGE: $150 · Education
Other$5,200Environment$2,150Arts & Culture$1,450Human Services$500Health$400Animals$250Education$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $1,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMURRAY ART GUILD: $1,350 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRENNA PELECIN FDN: $300 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MURRAY ART GUILD ↗
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds BRENNA PELECIN FDN ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beyer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beyer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beyer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph