Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Behnke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$333k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$307k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MHealth$65kHousing & Shelter$59kEducation$27kAnimals$15kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$4kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $250k+1 grant · $307k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNISH COLLEGE OF THE ARTS$307,202
WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES$5,869
FIFTH AVENUE THEATER$5,500
OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
SKIDMORE COLLEGE$2,500
THE LISA MCGRAW FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GRANT NW$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
LITTLE BIT THERAPECUTIC RIDING CENTER$1,500
THE COMMUNITY LIBRARY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BIRTHDAY DREAMS: $50 → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $150 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
KY

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+31%

Still filing today

57%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SKIDMORE COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +34%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $18k · revenue +27%
  • WP
    WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • C
    CHILDHAVENgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • OM
    OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER & CLINICSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

2
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
3
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
4
Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc

The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.

Arts & Culture
5
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Seattle Children's Guild Association

Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.

8
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
9
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
10
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

11
The University of Puget Sound

University of puget sound, as a community of learning, maintains a strong commitment to teaching excellence, scholarly engagement, and fruitful student-faculty interaction. the mission of the university is to develop in its students'…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Lisa Mcgraw Figure Skating Fdn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCulturally Focused Performi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionEnvironmental and Sustainab…Cancer Research and SupportResidential Care & Support …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr12%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%8%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr12%78%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
14%
4,250/30,652

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORTISSIMO — $1,429,730 · OtherFORTISSIMO+18 more — $76,794 · OtherWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $58,509 · Human Services+2 more — $200 · Human ServicesSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $22,250 · EducationOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,500 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $6,000 · HealthOVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER & CLINICS — $1,500 · Health+2 more — $300 · HealthWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $6,750 · AnimalsFERAL CARE — $3,000 · AnimalsTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsSEATTLE THEATRE GROUP — $2,500 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EVERGREEN CITY BALLET — $250 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $25 · Arts & CultureLISA MCGRAW FIGURE SKATING FDN — $3,500 · PhilanthropyLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $2,750 · Recreation & SportsHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,506,524Human Services$58,709Education$22,250Health$14,300Animals$10,750Arts & Culture$4,775Philanthropy$3,500Recreation & Sports$3,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFORTISSIMO — $1,429,730 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $58,509 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $22,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $6,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $5,114 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLISA MCGRAW FIGURE SKATING FDN — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFERAL CARE — $3,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE THEATRE GROUP — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER & CLINICS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARING SPEECH AND DEAFNESS CENTER DBA HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGREEN CITY BALLET — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC — $95 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBirthday Dreams — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSFUND — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORTISSIMO
  • Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
  • Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN
  • Who funds KINDERING CENTER
  • Who funds LISA MCGRAW FIGURE SKATING FDN
  • Who funds FERAL CARE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP
  • Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER & CLINICS
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC
  • Who funds HEARING SPEECH AND DEAFNESS CENTER DBA HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER
  • Who funds THE EVERGREEN CITY BALLET
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE
  • Who funds FIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression
  • Who funds Birthday Dreams
  • Who funds ARTSFUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Ash Family Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · Garneau Nicon Family Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Behnke Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Behnke Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Behnke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph