Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Becker Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$87kPhilanthropy$68kInternational$18kHuman Services$3kEducation$2kReligion$891Youth Development$600Food & Nutrition$515Other$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,030
Median grant
7
States reached
$700k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$10,250
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER$10,143
UMMS$5,500
Individual grant recipient$4,165
AFMDA$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,400
UJA FEDERATION$2,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,030
LONE SOLDIER FOUNDATION$1,000
JUSA$534
ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION$520
CHESEED FUND$515
GARDENS JEWISH$258
TEMPLE EMANUEL$257
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$177k · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$177k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+26%

Still filing today

36%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $53k · revenue +63%
  • AC
    ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +197%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -70%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • U
    UJA
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
4
Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The mission of the Jupiter Medical Center Foundation, Inc. is to secure the financial resources required to sustain clinical excellence and quality of care at Jupiter Medical Center, Inc. & its affiliates.

Philanthropy
5
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
6
The Assistance Fund Inc

To help insured people with life-changing diseases overcome the financial barriers preventing them from accessing treatment.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $38,188 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONUMMS: $28,200 · OtherUMMSAFMDA: $6,205 · OtherAFMDAIndividual grant recipient: $6,090 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+25 more: $15,855 · Other+25 moreJupiter Medical Center Inc: $52,529 · HealthJupiter Medical Center IncBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,550 · HealthHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $104 · HealthADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $18,320 · PhilanthropyADMIRALS COVE FO…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,455 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH AP…+1 more: $103 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $371 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $2,000 · EducationSTEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC: $600 · Youth DevelopmentCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$94,538Health$57,683Philanthropy$27,878International$10,371Education$2,000Youth Development$600Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $52,529 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $18,320 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,455 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach County Intergroup Association: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSTEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $371 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds Palm Beach County Intergroup Association ↗
  • Who funds STEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Becker Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Becker Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Becker Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph