Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ballko Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$428k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.1MEducation$383kPublic Safety & Disaster$275kRecreation & Sports$265kYouth Development$155kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$85,000
ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$65,000
FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH)$50,000
CAMP TWIN LAKES$40,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$40,000
CAMP SUNSHINE$40,000
CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT$20,000
SHEPHERD CENTER$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$8,000
CALLANWOLDE$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMP BRAVEHEART: $30k → 11%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $50k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $40k → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $85k → 14%CAMP BRAVEHEART: $30k → 11%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $75k → 14%CAMP BRAVEHEART: $30k → 11%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $60k → 14%CAMP BRAVEHEART: $30k → 11%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE: $60k → 14%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $30k → 11%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $30k → 14%FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $25k → 11%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $65k → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $30k → 14%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $40k → 13%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $30k → 14%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $40k → 13%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $30k → 14%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $40k → 13%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $30k → 14%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $30k → 13%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $30k → 14%CAMP TWIN LAKES: $30k → 13%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $25k → 14%CHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $25k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $40k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $40k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $40k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $40k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $40k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $40k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $40k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $40k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $30k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $25k → 14%CAMP SUNSHINE: $25k → 14%ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $65k → 14%ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $65k → 14%ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $40k → 14%ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $30k → 14%ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 14 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$2.2M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+24%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $270k · revenue +380%
  • CT
    CAMP TWIN LAKES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $265k · revenue +98%
  • CS
    CAMP SUNSHINE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $240k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
3
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
8
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
9
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
12
St Mary's Good Samaritan Foundation Inc

We, trinity health georgia and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. mary's good samaritan foundation is a member of the trinity health…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Emory University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH): $275,000 · OtherFAITH IN SERVING HUMANITY (FISH)CAMP SUNSHINE INC: $240,000 · OtherCAMP SUNSHINE INCCHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER: $190,000 · OtherCHOA AFLAC CANCER AND BLOOD CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE: $60,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $40,000 · Other+3 more: $50,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $305,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANT…ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $270,000 · HealthATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE C…SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INC+1 more: $15,000 · HealthEmory University: $240,000 · EducationEmory UniversityGeorgia Southern University Foundation Inc: $125,000 · EducationGeorgia Southern U…+1 more: $8,000 · EducationCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $265,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP TWIN LAK…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,010,000Health$630,000Education$373,000Recreation & Sports$265,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $305,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $270,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $265,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE INC: $240,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetEmory University: $240,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Southern University Foundation Inc: $125,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Southern University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ballko Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ballko Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ballko Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ballko Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ballko’s filings →

    More from the funding graph