Skip to content

· Public charity

The Arizona Agricultural Education FFA Foundation

The foundation cultivates strategic partnerships and secures financial resources to invest in arizona's ffa members, agricultural educators, & communities.

$583k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$414k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.0MEducation$1.2MYouth Development$424kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $558,604, the rows itemized in this filing. The $582,713 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,109 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
  • $250k+1 grant · $414k
$72,885
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$414,069
ARIZONA AGRICULTURE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION$72,885
U OF A COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION$61,500
FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA - ESTRELLA$10,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%U OF A COLLEGE OF AGRICULTUREEDUCATION TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION: $67k → 15%ESTRELLA FFA DISTRICT: $18k → 12%ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%U OF A COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION: $62k → 15%ESTRELLA FFA DISTRICT: $9k → 12%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $460k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $59k → 15%ESTRELLA FFA DISTRICT: $6k → 12%FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA: $414k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $50k → 15%ESTRELLA FFA DISTRICT: $6k → 12%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $364k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $45k → 15%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $348k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $45k → 15%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $338k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $40k → 15%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $332k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF: $36k → 15%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $328k → 11%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $323k → 11%FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA - ESTRELLA: $10k → 11%ARIZONA FFA ALUMNI: $10k → 11%ESTRELLA FFA DISTRICT: $9k → 11%WEST VALLEY MAVERICKS: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 4 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$3.2M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+196%
+331%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $486k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M
  • AV
    ARIZONA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $346k · revenue +191% · 76% of their budget
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $340k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VALLEY MAVERICKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +331%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFA: $2,511,240 · OtherARIZONA ASSOCIATION FFAARIZONA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $346,220 · OtherARIZONA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC+2 more: $99,645 · OtherFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA: $424,219 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE FARME…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $340,000 · EducationARIZONA ST…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,935 · PhilanthropyWEST VALLEY MAVERICKS FOUNDATION: $8,900 · Public Benefit
Other$2,957,105Youth Development$424,219Education$340,000Philanthropy$10,935Public Benefit$8,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA: $424,219 over 1y, 42% of budgetARIZONA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $346,220 over 8y, 76% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $340,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,935 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VALLEY MAVERICKS FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arizona Agricultural Education FFA Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arizona Agricultural Education FFA Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arizona Agricultural Education FFA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph