Skip to content

· Public charity

The Andrew McDonough B Foundation

The andrew mcdonough b+ foundation fights childhood cancer by: providing financial assistance to families of kids with cancer; funding cutting-edge pediatric cancer research; and advocating for increased funding and awareness.

$9.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$385k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$14MEducation$2.4MRecreation & Sports$150kEmployment$75kScience & Tech$75k
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $2,380,504, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,279,033 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,898,529 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $644k
$75,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$385,000
THE CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP$258,504
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$150,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$150,000
WEILL CORNELL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$150,000
HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER$120,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$85,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER$75,000
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE$75,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$75,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$75,000
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$75,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEMOURS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $213k → 10%ONCHOEROES BIOSCIENCES INC: $100k → 7%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $75k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $95k → 6%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%OFFICE OF RESEARCH & SPONSORED PROJECTS: $75k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DR DAVIS: $75k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CALIFORNIA - DR SCHWER: $75k → 10%CITY OF HOPE: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%WEILL CCORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $75k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $75k → 28%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER - DR BISHOP: $75k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $385k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $75k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $75k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $75k → 11%HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER: $195k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $150k → 12%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%THE CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP: $259k → 9%LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $225k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%ONCOHEROES BIOSCIENCES INC: $100k → 7%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $385k → 16%HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER: $120k → 14%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%THE CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP: $195k → 9%LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $150k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 7%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $107k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $150k → 16%HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER: $95k → 14%THE CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP: $170k → 9%CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP: $250k → 22%THE CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP: $100k → 9%THE CHOP FOUNDATION: $100k → 22%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $85k → 22%WEILL CORNELL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 17%SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $120k → 9%SEATTLE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $100k → 10%SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $95k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 49 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
46

Total granted

$12M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+54%

Still filing today

29%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $627k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +47%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +50%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • OB
    ONCOHEROES BIOSCIENCES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • TC
    THE CHOP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $993,504 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACCELERATE: $400,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $375,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $375,000 · Other+79 more: $9,026,047 · Other+79 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $1,145,000 · EducationBaylor College of Med…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $450,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…New York University: $300,000 · EducationNew York UniversityUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $150,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $105,000 · Education+2 more: $150,000 · EducationHARVARD MEDICAL CENTER: $410,000 · HealthHARVARD MEDICAL…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $300,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $295,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S …Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $277,000 · HealthDana-Farber Can…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $210,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $170,000 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDRE…THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $75,000 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $75,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $75,000 · HealthBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $75,000 · Health+2 more: $72,000 · Health
Other$11,169,551Education$3,050,000Health$2,184,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,145,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $450,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $300,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $295,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $277,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $210,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $185,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $52,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Andrew McDonough B Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Andrew McDonough B Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrew McDonough B’s filings →

More from the funding graph