Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Inc

To advance the science, art, and safe practice of aesthetic plastic surgery among qualified plastic surgeons through support and direction of medical education and research, sponsorship of scientific meetings and dissemination of information on current asethetic surgical

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $48,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $50,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS$20,000
TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS$10,000
NEW JERSETY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS$9,000
FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $20k → 10%CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGERY: $15k → 9%TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGERY: $10k → 10%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $20k → 14%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 7%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 11%LOUISIANA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS: $10k → 19%MARYLAND SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $8k → 6%MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 10%CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $15k → 9%TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGERY: $10k → 10%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%NEW JERSETY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 7%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 11%LOUISIANA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS: $10k → 19%CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGERY: $12k → 9%TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 10%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 7%CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 9%TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 10%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%NEW JERSETY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $9k → 7%TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $8k → 10%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $8k → 7%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $10k → 5%FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS: $9k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MA
NJ
CA
UT
MD
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$305k · 5 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$305k
$18k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +37%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS
    5× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue -23%
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $67k

Funded once

  • MS
    MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MS
    MARYLAND SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS
    one grant, 2018 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC — $99,000 · OtherFLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INCCALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS — $72,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONSNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS — $66,500 · OtherNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONSLOUISIANA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS — $20,000 · OtherLOUISIANA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONSMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $8,000 · OtherTEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS — $47,500 · HealthTEXAS SOCIETY OF…
Other$275,500Health$47,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC — $99,000 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS — $72,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS — $66,500 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetTEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS — $47,500 over 5y, 6.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGEONS
  • Who funds TEXAS SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

American Society of Plastic SurgeonsIL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph