Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The American Philosophical Association

THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION promotes the discipline and profession of philosophy, both within the academy and in the public arena.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$767kArts & Culture$20k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $20,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $47,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $10k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $101k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF PA: $10k → 6%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILOSOPHY TEACHERS: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $53k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%CORRUPT THE YOUTH: $18k → 10%RICE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK: $5k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $10k → 13%DEPAUW UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%STATE OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%PIKSI (MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY): $84k → 8%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILOSOPHY TEACHERS: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $53k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $10k → 13%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $60k → 8%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILOSOPHY TEACHERS: $5k → 9%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $50k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $60k → 8%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $39k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 8%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $18k → 16%PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY): $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
CA
MD
AR
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 42% of The American Philosophical Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The American Philosophical Associationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$299k · 5 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$299k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+43%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P(
    PIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY)
    5× · 2018–2022 · $169k
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2024 · $75k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    2× · 2018–2022 · $20k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • CT
    CORRUPT THE YOUTH
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $330,263 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $15,000 · EducationCornell University — $15,000 · Education+7 more — $65,000 · Education+7 morePIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY) — $169,254 · OtherPIKSI (PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY)PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY — $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILOSOPHY TEACHERS — $19,500 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHILOSOPHY TEACHERSCORRUPT THE YOUTH — $17,938 · Other+6 more — $40,000 · Other+6 more
Education$425,263Other$361,692

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $330,263 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University
  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Wellesley College
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy IncDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The American Philosophical Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology26% of income from government
  • Northeastern University4% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph