· Private foundation
The Am Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $260k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $80,000 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC | $60,000 |
| RIVERS SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| ISSUE ONE | $25,000 |
| MIL MILAGROS | $25,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI | $25,000 |
| COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF GREATER BOSTON | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR WOMEN AND ENTERPRISE | $20,000 |
| HOPE & MAIN | $15,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER | $15,000 |
| BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| NICARAGUAN EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| PHILANTHROPY MASSACHUSETTS | $10,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JSJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $340k · revenue +61%
- TRTHE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +19%
- DCDEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL2× · 2020–2021 · $153k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- LCLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS INCone grant, 2021 · $100k
- TBTHE BOSTON RESILIENCY FUNDone grant, 2020 · $100k
- NTNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBORone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thacher & Straitsmouth Islands Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NUYA INC ↗
- Who funds ISSUE ONE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds JITEGEMEE INC ↗
- Who funds RIAN IMMIGRANT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE & MAIN ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds ROOT NS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON'S HIGHER GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds NICARAGUAN EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Julies Family Learning Program Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds United for A Fair Economy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Children's Hospital Corporation · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Fidelity Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The John H and H Naomi Tomfohrde Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Am Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc — 45% of income from government
- Brookview House Inc — 34% of income from government
- Center for Women & Enterprise Inc — 27% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- Jewish Healthcare Center Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- West End House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston's Higher Ground Inc — 2% of income from government
- Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.