· Private foundation
The Adrian and Sally Duplantier Family Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of THE ADRIAN AND SALLY DUPLANTIER FAMILY FUND’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THERESIANS INTERNATIONAL | $2,000 |
| PEOPLE PROGRAM NOLA | $1,000 |
| WLAE NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC TELEVISION | $1,000 |
| CITY PARK CONSERVANCY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| NOTRE DAME SEMINARY | $500 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $500 |
| FRIENDS HELPING KIDS INC KREWE DE C | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 29 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +27%
- LULOYOLA UNIVERSITY2× · 2018–2019 · $16k · revenue +31%
- OCOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPH'S ABBEY SEMINARY COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $1k
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANAone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -6%
- SSST SCHOLASTICA ACADEMYone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…
Support of the city of new orleans library system and city wide literacy efforts through parnter organizations, community organizations and initiatives including fundraising and expending funds to supplement library operations.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
Sustaining Our Urban Landscape's mission is to drive a resilient and environmentally equitable New Orleans through reforesting our city.
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
The Arts Council of New Orleans dba Arts New Orleans is a private, nonprofit organization with 501(c)(3) status dedicated to supporting arts and culture in the city.
The Foundation is committed to preserving the cultural and architectural heritage of Louisiana through advocacy, stewardship, and education and encourages community participation through a number of preservation programs.
Provides housing for elderly and disabled persons and families under section 207/223(f) of the national housing act under an agreement with the department of hud.
To foster regional economic development and create quality jobs within the metropolitan new orleans area.
Nw la food bank's mission is to be the primary resource for fighting hunger in northwest louisiana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra and the most unlike its peers is Earth Share Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds Theresians International Inc ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS BOTANICAL GARDEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds LAKEVIEW SHEPHERD CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds EARTH SHARE GARDENS ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CITY PARK ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CITY PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WILLWOODS COMMUNITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Azby Fund · J Edgar Monroe Foundation · Patrick F Taylor Foundation · Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust · Louise H Moffett Family Foundation · Ronnie & Gwen Briggs Foundation · Zemurray Foundation · The Booth-Bricker Fund · The Usdin-Weil Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Adrian and Sally Duplantier Family Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Adrian and Sally Duplantier Family Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Adrian and Sally Duplantier Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.