Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ada Lee Ricks Broussard Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$75kYouth Development$28kInternational$20kEducation$14kOther$82k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDAR HILL ACTION TEAM$2,500
CEDAR HILL MUSEUM OF HISTORY$1,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 32%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Louisiana United Methodist Children & Family Svcs: $75k → 32%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$74k · 4 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$74k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+38%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRAND CHENIER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $29k
  • CH
    CEDAR HILL ACTION TEAM
    6× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue -10%
  • IS
    INSPIRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS
    3× · 2018–2023 · $14k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • LU
    LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +38%
  • MC
    MacDonell Children's Home
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRAND CHENIER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $29,000 · OtherGRAND CHENIER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMacDonell Children's Home — $25,000 · OtherMacDonell Children's HomeTHE HEIGHTS — $10,000 · OtherTHE HEIGHTSINSPIRE SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherINSPIRE SCHOOLCity of Cedar Hill Zula B Wylie Public Library — $5,000 · OtherCity of Cedar Hill Zula B Wylie Public Lib…CEDAR HILL MUSEUM OF HISTORY — $3,100 · Other+2 more — $5,000 · Other+2 moreLOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & …CEDAR HILL ACTION TEAM — $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentCEDAR HILL ACT…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT HO…INSPIRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS — $13,500 · Education
Other$82,100Human Services$75,000Youth Development$28,000International$20,000Education$13,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCEDAR HILL ACTION TEAM — $28,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS — $13,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CEDAR HILL ACTION TEAM
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INSPIRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ada Lee Ricks Broussard Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph